Confused by Notation: Need Help Understanding c!

  • Thread starter Thread starter tigger88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Notation
tigger88
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm just confused by notation in this question, because the textbook I use has different notation than my course notes and now I'm just not sure what anything means.

Homework Equations



Group velocity x Phase velocity = c^2

The Attempt at a Solution



What is c in this case? Is it the speed of light, or some other velocity?
I know it's a really stupid question...

Ta for any help though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I assume that it is the speed of light. But really, the equation is not true in general.
Yes, photons move at c in free space, so phase velocity is c in free space (but inside midiums, the speed would get lower.).
However, the group velocity, could actually be lower than c. even 0. Just for reference, this is called EIT.
So if it is someother speed, well, normally it would be denoted as v, instead of c. c is normally reserved for the speed of light, or constant.
I guess what the most important part of this equation is that group velocity and phase velocity are the same in most of the cases: so if it is light, then it is c^2; if it is something else, then it is v^2. It is kinda open interpretation.
 
According to Wikipedia it is indeed the speed of light. I've never seen that particular equation before myself, but the derivation on Wikipedia looks reasonable...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top