Confused lost and demoralised >.<

  • Thread starter Thread starter semc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Lost
AI Thread Summary
Struggling with the basics of physics is common among first-year students, and it's important to recognize that developing problem-solving skills takes time. Many students find lab experiments frustrating as they often don't match theoretical predictions due to various factors, including experimental errors and simplifying assumptions in theories. Transitioning from a desire to be a nano engineer to considering theoretical physics is valid, as theoretical physicists focus more on problem-solving than on experimental validation. Persistence in understanding concepts, practicing problems, and seeking help from peers and professors is crucial for success in physics. Ultimately, the intellectual rewards of studying physics can be significant, making the challenges worthwhile.
semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
Hi guys i am currently a year 1 student and i am doing physics major and i am having a tough time now Even though what i am learning now is the basic of physics, sometimes i find myself lost during lecture and can't make any sense of what the lecturer is saying. Is this a common thing that most people experience or is it just me :cry:

At times i have though of giving up and do some other degree but i can't really think of what other things i want to do other than physics :frown: So do you guys think that even someone with such low caliber can do physics?

I have always been fascinated by cool gadgets and the job prospect of being a nano engineer has always been very appealing to me until i started to do physics major that is. I have found myself hating to go to physics lab classes because we just can't produce the damn theoretical result that we wanted or expected and i find that very annoying. The lab manager told us it is impossible to get the experimental data from the theory that we learn and that greatly disappoint me for some reason.

After the experience i felt that being a theoretical physicist might be what i really wanted to do since i prefer to solve questions and understand physics rather than proof them by doing countless experiments. I read a book which briefly talks about the period when string theory was first introduced and i decided that this is the thing i want to do and not sitting around the lab watching the pendulum However i have been wondering does a theoretical physicist have to do experiments to proof their point? So do you guys think that i should continue my pursuit to be a nano engineer or follow what i think i want even though i am not so smart and be a theoretical physicist?

I apologize if some of the statement does not make sense as i am in kinda confused state when i am typing this:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll find that the first year of physics is the toughest because that's when you're developing your problem solving intuition. Go through all the worked examples in the chapter and make sure you understand them. Then keep working through problems all the time, get a solutions manual to check your answers.
 
Experiments rarely ever give you exactly the same result as theory. Theories are full of assumptions to simplify the problem and experiments are full of experimental errors resulting from improper calibration, lack of experience of the experimenter, and in an undergrad lab course the equipment probably sucks anyways.

For example, you mentioned watching a pendulum. My guess is that you are using the basic equation to theoretically calculate the period of the pendulum. T=2pi*sqrt(L/g) Well this equation is only valid when the angle is very small. You should look up the equation for when the angle is not so small and you will see why these simplifying assumptions are necessary.

So my point is that you shouldn't be disappointed that the data doesn't fit the theory very well.

I also doubt that any real experiments that physicists are doing involve watching pendulums swing back an forth, the stuff they are doing now is infinitely more exciting. If physics is really what you want to to do then you should stick with it and work hard to understand the concepts in class. Do the practice problems, work with friends, get a tutor, talk to the professor...whatever it takes. And don't be so quick to give up on working in a lab. Try to get involved in research with a professor and see what real experiments are like. And talk to professors who are more involved with theory and see what that is like.
 
Being a physics major is not easy. Remember, you're taking a course as a first year that is considered by many, to be the hardest course they will ever take at university. You're taking it as a freshman! And you're going to take four more years (at least!) of courses building on this course. It is not easy. Physics involves methods of thinking that you probably have not developed, yet.

However, physics is also one of the most intellectually rewarding fields one can study. Every hard problem, every late night studying, every long lecture pays you back tens times over with an unparalleled depth of understanding of nature and the world around you.

Don't give up! Do every problem you can. Don't get discouraged by bad data in lab or a tough class. You can do it, and if you do, it will be worth it.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top