Confused on which equation to use (simple question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter KYUI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
A uniform electric field exists between two charged parallel plates, and a proton is released from the positively charged plate, striking the negatively charged plate after 1.60 microseconds. The participant initially calculated acceleration using the equation x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a t^2, resulting in an acceleration of 1.2812*10^10 m/s². However, they encountered discrepancies in velocity calculations using different equations, ultimately finding the correct answer with v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a (x - x_0). The confusion stemmed from a calculation error, which was clarified through community feedback. The discussion highlights the importance of careful calculation and verification when solving physics problems.
KYUI
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform electric field exists in the region between two oppositely charged parallel plates (1.64*10-2)m apart. A proton is released from rest at the surface of the positively charged plate and strikes the surface of the opposite plate in a time interval (1.60*10−6)s.

Find the speed of the proton at the moment it strikes the negatively charged plate.

Homework Equations


x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a t^2
v = v_0 + a t
v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a (x - x_0)

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I found a by using this equation (x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a t^2) and it came out to be 1.2812*10^10.
To find velocity when it hits, I realized that I get a different answer when I use this (v = v_0 + a t) and that (v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a (x - x_0)). The correct answer came out when I used the latter equation.

So my question is, why is it that I can't use the first equation? Shouldn't they come out to be the same answer? Did I do something wrong?

Thanks guys.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you just aren't making a mistake in the calculation? I get the same answer both ways.
 
oh i feel stupid. thank you very much haha i calculated it couple times before i posted it but I guess I had a mistake in it.

Man, it took me awhile to write this too.

anyways, thanks. :)
 
lol you're welcome.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top