Calculating Work Done by a Confusing Force Function | F=ma, W=Fd

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by a force function, F = F_0(x/x_0 - 1), as a particle moves from x = 0 to x = 2x_0. Participants express confusion about the meanings of the constants x_0 and F_0, clarifying that they represent fixed values, typically at t = 0. To graph the function before integration, it is suggested to place x_0 at a positive value, such as x = 1, to simplify calculations. The integration limits are confirmed to be from 0 to 2x_0, ensuring clarity in the graphing process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the function's constants and proper graph labeling for effective integration.
DrummingAtom
Messages
657
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The force on a particle is directed along an x-axis and given by F = F_0(\frac {x}{x_0} -1). Find the work done by the force in moving the particle from x = 0 to x = 2x_0


Homework Equations


F=ma, W=Fd, etc.


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't even know how to interpret that function. Does the x_0 mean the initial position? Does F_0 mean the initial force? I'm so confused. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DrummingAtom! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
DrummingAtom said:
I don't even know how to interpret that function. Does the x_0 mean the initial position? Does F_0 mean the initial force?

That's right :smile:

a "0" subscript always means a constant (usually the value at t = 0). :wink:

(oh … except in relativity, where x0 means time! :rolleyes: :biggrin:)
 
I'm still confused on this one. So, if x0 F0 are constants then how would the graph of this function look? Because they want you to graph F(x) before integrating. I mean what do you pick for your constant in a situation like this? I know it's going to be a linear function.
 
Last edited:
DrummingAtom said:
I'm still confused on this one. So, if x0 F0 are constants then how would the graph of this function look? Because they want you to graph F(x) before integrating. I mean what do you pick for your constant in a situation like this? I know it's going to be a linear function.

It doesn't really matter, as long as x0 is not 0 (otherwise you'll have a divide by zero problem). But if you want to make your life easier, put it on the positive x-axis somewhere. I suggest putting it at x = 1. That way you'll integrate from 0 to 2. But don't label you x-axis with '1' and '2'; rather label you x-axis to go from

0...x0...2x0...3x0...

Now when you consider your graph's labels, you are integrating from 0 to 2x0, as the problem specifies! :cool:

The y-axis is F. So where does F0 fit into your graph? I'll let you do that.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top