Confusion about electron energy levels

Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13
If 4s orbital is in the 4th shell and 3d is in the 3rd shell and if the Principal Quantum Number is the direct indication of the amount of energy in of the electrons in that shell. Then, why according to Aufbau principle is 4s filled before 3d?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because an atom's energy doesn't depend on one quantum number only. In other words, if you model the electronic configuration of the multi-electron atom/ion as to resemble the hydrogen's, then there are other effects to take into account (spin, special relativity, screening of the nuclear charge by the inner electrons). There's no 100% accurate theoretical description of the Aufbau Principle, but there are rigorous arguments in favor of it.
If all was simple, then 1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 3d < 4s < 4p < 4d < 4f < 5s < 5p < 5d < 5f < 5g < 6s ... would be the normal energy diagram (as for the plain simple H-atom/hydrogenic ions in Schrödinger's description), but due to a myriad of effects (symmetry of the spin-spin couplings between electrons, special relativity), we have these inversions: 1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 4s < 3d < 4p < 5s < 4d < 5p < 6s < 4f < 5d < 6p < 7s ...
 
What are the arguments?
 
For seeing whether that which orbital has higher energy there a formula in which we have to calculate n+l where n is Principal quantum number and l is Azimuthal quantum number.
Orbital having more value of n+l has high energy.
If value of n+l is equal for two orbitals than orbital having higher principal quantum number has higher energy.
 
Murtuza Tipu said:
For seeing whether that which orbital has higher energy there a formula in which we have to calculate n+l where n is Principal quantum number and l is Azimuthal quantum number.
Orbital having more value of n+l has high energy.
If value of n+l is equal for two orbitals than orbital having higher principal quantum number has higher energy.

Okay. But that seems to be against the notion: The farther you pull an electron from the nucleus, the more potential energy it has.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top