Connection between Lorentz covariance and special relativity

fezster
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
s2 = t2 - x2 - y2 - z2

This equation is covariant (Lorentz covariance). The interval "s" is invariant (Lorentz invariance).

Can you derive everything in special relativity from these facts? Or am I mistaken about that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fezster said:
Can you derive everything in special relativity from these facts?

It depends on what you mean by "everything". You can derive everything about the spacetime structure, yes.
 
  • Like
Likes fezster
PeterDonis said:
It depends on what you mean by "everything". You can derive everything about the spacetime structure, yes.
When I say everything, I mean can we explain all the phenomena that arises due to special relativity on the basis of just these facts.

So, if we can predict all the phenomena of special relativity from the spacetime structure, and everything about spacetime can be derived from these facts, then the answer would be yes. Is that right?
 
fezster said:
if we can predict all the phenomena of special relativity from the spacetime structure, and everything about spacetime can be derived from these facts, then the answer would be yes. Is that right?

Yes, as long as you also stipulate that all of the other laws of physics must be covariant (for example, Maxwell's Equations governing the electromagnetic field). This is not a problem because we have covariant forms of all those other laws. But it should be noted that spacetime, by itself, is not everything.
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Special relativity vs Lorentz invariance
Replies
29
Views
3K
A Covariant form of Maxwell's (inhomogeneous) equations (in GR)
Replies
9
Views
712
I Physical Difference Between Co- and Contravariant Vectors
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Development of Special Relativity
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
I Explore Spacetimes, Metrics & Symmetries in Relativity Theory
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Proof of Invariance of Spacetime Interval
Replies
6
Views
1K
I Special Relativity vs Lorentz Transformation: Difference Explained
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Derivation of SR's time-dilatation in 1d?
2
Replies
60
Views
5K
I What is the experience of a photon?
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Tensors & Lorentz Transform: Is There a Connection?
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top