Conservation Laws in Rotational Motion Physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy, total kinetic energy, and angular momentum of a uniform solid sphere rolling without slipping. The initial calculations presented for these values contained errors, particularly in the handling of units and the application of formulas. Corrections were made, leading to revised values: 2 J for rotational kinetic energy, 7 J for total kinetic energy, and 4 kg*m^2/s for angular momentum. The importance of squaring the speed in the translational kinetic energy formula and using the correct moment of inertia was emphasized. The final consensus indicates that the recalculated answers align with the physics principles governing rotational motion.
Lma12684
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform solid sphere, with diameter 28 cm and mass 2.5 kg, rolls without slipping on a horizontal surface, at constant speed of 2.0 m/s.
1) What is the rotational kinetic energy?
2) What is its total kinetic energy?
3) What is its angular momentum?


Homework Equations



1) KE=1/2 Iw^2
2) KE=1/2 Mv(cm) + 1/2*I(cm)*w^2
3) L=Iw



The Attempt at a Solution



1) KE=1/2(2/5MR^2)(v/r)
=1/2(19.6)(.14)
=1.372

2) KE=1/2 (2.5)(2.0)+ 1/2 (19.6)*(.14^2)
=2.69

3) L=(19.6)(.14)
=2.744

Does this solution look good? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KE_{linear} = \frac{1}{2} m v^{2}_{cm}
 
Did I forget the square on #2? Is that what you are saying? Thanks.
 
Hi Lma12684,

Two things about 1): You did not square the (v/r) term; also, since you don't have units, I'm assuming that you want them in SI units. However, 19.6 is not correct for the moment of inertia. It's probably better to convert the radius to meters before you enter it in your calculator; or, if you wait until the end remember that there are two factor of centimeters in I, and you have to convert both of them to meters.
 
Ok, I recalculated and found:

1) 2 J
2) 4.99 J
3) 3.99 J
 
The first one looks right to me, but not the answers for #2 and #3. It's difficult to tell, though, since you haven't posted the numbers you used.

For #2, was the 4.99 J for the total energy, or did you actually just calculate the translational kinetic energy? It looks like you may not have added the rotational KE to the translational KE.

For #3, it won't have units of Joules. Also, did you perhaps (incorrectly) square the omega term?
 
Here is what I did:

2) KE=1/2MV(cm) + 1/2 I(cm)w^2
=1/2(2.5)(2.0) + 1/2(.0196)(204.08)
=4.99 J

3) L=Iw
=(.0196)(204.08)
=3.99 J
 
Lma12684 said:
Here is what I did:

2) KE=1/2MV(cm) + 1/2 I(cm)w^2
=1/2(2.5)(2.0) + 1/2(.0196)(204.08)
=4.99 J

3) L=Iw
=(.0196)(204.08)
=3.99 J

In #2, you did not square the 2.0 for the speed in the translational kinetic energy.

In #3, you can see from #2 that 204.08 is w^2, but here you need w.
 
Thank You Again!
 
  • #10
Since it is a sphere then the moment of inertia is

I = 2/5mr^2

so the equations I used for a,b, and c are:

a) KE = (1/2)(2/5mr^2)(v^2/r^2) = 2.0J
b) KE = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2Iw^2 = 5.0J + 2.0J = 7.0J
c) L = Iw = 4.0 kg*m^2/s

I think this is right, what do you think?

also, w^2 = (v^2/r^2) so the radius cancels out and I didn't have to use r = 0.14 m
 
Back
Top