Conservation of Angular Momentum and Vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of angular momentum, particularly in the context of a person on a rotating chair holding a rotating wheel. When the wheel's axis is vertical, the person rotates in the opposite direction, illustrating that total angular momentum is conserved by combining the momenta of both bodies. A key question raised is whether the wheel would spin faster when turned 90 degrees, as the person would stop rotating, suggesting only one body is in motion. Additionally, there is confusion about the angular momentum vector being perpendicular to the plane of rotation and whether this implies a force in that direction. Clarification on these concepts is sought to better understand the principles of angular momentum.
esmeralda4
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'll come straight out with this, I'm really struggling to understand the conservation of angular momentum.

A common example involves someone sitting on a rotating chair holding a rotating wheel. If the wheel is held so that the axis of rotation is vertical then the person rotates in the opposite direction.

The total angular momentum is conserved by adding together the momentum of the two bodies.

Does this mean that when the wheel is turned 90 degrees then it will spin faster since the person on the chair is no longer rotating? The wheel would have to spin faster to conserve angular momentum since there is now only one body rotating right? If this is wrong can someone help to explain please?

Also I don't understand what it means to say the vector of angular momentum is perpendicular to the plane of rotation. Does that mean there is a force in this direction? If not then why not since momentum includes a mass and velocity?

Hope that makes sense.

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this: https://www.khanacademy.org/science/physics/torque-angular-momentum/torque-tutorial/v/conservation-of-angular-momemtum

Or this: http://www.triumphofmind.net/2011/07/angular-momentum-is-easy-or-physics-of.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top