Conservation of Angular Momentum of merry-go-round

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new angular velocity of a merry-go-round after a child jumps on it. The initial conditions include a merry-go-round with a moment of inertia of 250 kg*m^2, rotating at 10 rpm, and a child weighing 25 kg. Conservation of angular momentum is applied, leading to the calculation of the final angular velocity as 7.14 rpm when treating the child as a point mass. There is debate on whether to treat the child as a point mass or approximate its shape as a cylinder, with the consensus favoring the point mass approach for simplicity. The final conclusion emphasizes using the point mass formula for accurate results in this scenario.
nx01
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A merry-go-round of radius 2m has a moment of inertia 250kg*m^2, and is rotating at 10rpm on a frictionless axle. Facing the axle and initially at rest, a 25kg child hops on the edge of the merry-go-round and manages to hold on. What will be the new angular velocity of the merry-go-round after the child jumps on?

Homework Equations



Li (system) = Lf (system)

The Attempt at a Solution



Let g = merry-go-round and c = child.

Li = Lf, so (IW)g-initial = (IW)g+c-final.

Solving for Ic:

Ic = mr^2 = (25kg)(2m)^2 = 100kg*m^s

Solving for Ig+c:

Ig+c = Ig + Ic = 350kg*m^s

Solving for final angular velocity of system:

W(g+c)-final = (IW)g-initial / Ig+c = [(250kg*m^2)(10rpm)] / 350kg*m^s = 7.14rpm.


My question is, should I be treating the child as a point-mass, allowing me to use I = mr^2 -- or should I approximate its shape in determining I? (Treating it as a cylinder - I = .5mr^2 - I get 8.33rpm.)

Any insight into this will be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi nx01! :smile:
nx01 said:
… should I be treating the child as a point-mass, allowing me to use I = mr^2

yes :smile:
-- or should I approximate its shape in determining I? (Treating it as a cylinder - I = .5mr^2 - I get 8.33rpm.)

no, it would be I = .5mr2 + mR2

where r and R are the radius of the cylinder and of the merry-go-round, respectively :wink:
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top