Conservation of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of angular momentum in a system where a body is rotated with no external tangential forces acting on it. The initial angular momentum is defined as Lo = Ro * Vo * m, where Ro is the constant radius, Vo is the tangential velocity, and m is the mass. When the string is pulled, the velocity is expressed as V(t) = (Vo * Ro) / r(t), assuming no torque is applied. The tangential acceleration is derived as a(t) = (-Vo * Ro) / (r(t)^2) * r'(t). It is concluded that while external forces can affect r'(t), they can be added to the calculated acceleration if they do not change r'(t).
MechatronO
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Imagine a body that is attached to a massless string and then rotated in such a manner that no external forces like gravity acts on the body in tangential direction.

The body now has the angular momentum with respect to the axis of rotation

Lo = Ro * Vo * m

Where

Ro = constant initial radius of rotation
Vo = constant initial tangential velocity
m= mass of the body

If the string is pulled in with respect to time, and no torque is applied with respect to the axis of rotation would the velocity be this, according to the law about conservation of angular momentum?

V(t)=\frac{Vo*Ro}{r(t)} ?



And would the tangential acceleration then be

a(t)=\frac{-Vo*Ro}{(r(t)^2)}*r(t)' ?

Where

r(t)´ = the derivate of the radius of rotation with respect to time

If so, could this acceleration be added directly to external forces that is causing tangential acceleration?

The purpose is forwarding a regulator that will control the acceleration of a robot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right.
External forces could change r'(t), but if they do not, I would expect that you can add them.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top