B Conservation of Energy: Ball on a U-Shaped Ramp

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulb203
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy as a ball rolls down a U-shaped ramp, illustrating the conversion between gravitational potential energy (U) and kinetic energy (K). Without friction, the ball oscillates indefinitely between the heights of the ramp, with U at the tops and K at the bottoms. When friction is considered, some kinetic energy is lost to thermal and sound energy, preventing the ball from reaching the original height on the opposite side. The total energy remains constant, but it transforms into different forms, including internal energy due to friction. Overall, the explanation effectively captures the principles of energy conservation and transformation in this scenario.
paulb203
Messages
194
Reaction score
75
TL;DR Summary
Trying to grasp the basics
I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
paulb203 said:
TL;DR Summary: Trying to grasp the basics

I’m working my way through Khan Academy’s High School Physics and I want to check that I’m getting the concept of conservation of energy. Is the following at least roughly correct?

When a ball is rolled down a U-shaped ramp from the top of one side it will, ignoring friction, travel to the bottom of the ramp, up the other side to the top, back down , and up the first side to where it began, etc, etc, ad infinitum.

The U is converted to K as the ball descends, and the K is converted to U as it ascends.

At the respective tops the U ‘tank’ is full. At the bottom it is empty.

At the tops the K ‘tank’ is empty. At the bottom it is full.

Halfway down, or up, both tanks are half full.

**
When rolling it down, and taking friction into account, it won’t get quite to the top of the other side as some of K will be converted to thermal energy and sound energy. It will get part the way up the other side, to position h, descend, and then part the way up the first side, but not as far as h, etc.
The total energy at the outset = the total energy once the ball has come to rest at the bottom of the ramp. If there was x Joules of U(GPE) at the beginning there is x Joules of energy now, but in different forms.
Yeah, when you introduce friction you add some more “internal energy tanks” for the system and its surroundings i.e. the mass in the ball can change temperature, or the mass in the space around the ball can change temp, sound, light, and maybe some exotic things I don’t think/know about. These new tanks don’t share with potential and kinetic energy tanks without additional work, but they will share with each other. “Heat” ( the flow of thermal energy) will occur between the system and its surroundings.
 
  • Like
Likes paulb203 and Ibix
You got it.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top