Conservation of Energy - Max height WITH Air resistance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum height a ball reaches after being dropped from 30 meters, considering air resistance modeled by F=kv^2. The user attempts to apply conservation of energy principles but struggles with the impact of air resistance on kinetic energy. It is suggested that a differential equation approach is necessary to accurately account for the forces acting on the ball during its fall and rise. The user initially calculates a collision speed of 3.668 m/s but ultimately seeks clarification on the correct method to find the maximum height, which is stated to be 9.15 meters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly modeling energy loss due to air resistance in the calculations.
kornelijepetak
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball (m=0.7kg) is dropped from a height (h=30m). The air resistance force is given by the formula F=kv^2 where k=0.0228 and v is the ball's speed. The ball bounces after a perfectly elastic collision.
  • Calculate the maximum height the ball reaches after the collision!

Homework Equations


Since we are talking about a perfectly elastic collision, the kinetic energy before and after the collision is the same.
E_k = E_k'.

Also the law of conservation of energy holds.

The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure what I'm doing wrong. Here's what I tried:
  • DURING FALL
First I tried to write the energy state during the fall. Left side of the equation is the state at t=0, and the right side is at the moment just before the collision.
E_k + E_p + W = E_{k}' + E_{p}'
W is the work that the air resistance force does on the ball.
Kinetic energy at start equals 0, and potential energy at the moment of collision equals 0.
That leads to (*):
E_p + W = E_{k}'
The speed of the rigid body during the free fall is given by v^2=2gh, which leads to F(v)=kv^2 \Rightarrow F(s)=2kgs
The work of the air resistance along the fall
W=\int F(s) \, ds=\int 2kgs\, ds=2kg\int s\,ds=2kg\frac{s^2}{2}=kgs^2
I repeat one of the previous equations (*), expanded:
mgh - kgh^2 = \frac{mv^2}{2}
Here is the thing I am not sure about: should the Work be negative (like I have written) since the direction of the force that does the work is opposite of the movement?

Entering the given values in this equation I get v_{collision}=3.668 [m/s].
  • DURING RISE
Then I tried to write the energy state after collision and during the rise. Left side of the equation is the state at the moment just after the collision and the right side is the moment in which the height is at maximum (y_{max}) (after the collision).
E_k + E_p + W = E_{k}' + E_{p}'
W is the work that the air resistance force does on the ball during its rise.
Potential energy at the moment of collision equals 0, and kinetic energy at the highest point equals 0.
That leads to (**):
E_k + W = E_{p}'
I used the previously calculated formula for work, only this time, the height is not h, but y_{max}.
Now I have:
\frac{mv^2}{2} - kgy_{max}^2 = mgy_{max}

This gives me a quadratic equation for y_{max}.

The roots of this quadratic equation are (v entered as v_{collision}):
y_{max1} = 0.671[m],y_{max2}=-31.372[m].

The latter has no sense for height, and the former is incorrect. The correct answer is 9.15[m].

What do I do incorrectly?
Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello KP, welcome to PF :smile: !
##
v^2=2gh## gets spoilt by the loss of kinetic energy due to air resistance, so you'll have to revert to a differential equation. Would that work for you ?
 
BvU said:
Hello KP, welcome to PF :smile: !
##
v^2=2gh## gets spoilt by the loss of kinetic energy due to air resistance, so you'll have to revert to a differential equation. Would that work for you ?

It probably would, but I am not sure what you mean. You mean diff equation for v? Unfortunatelly, I am not sure I know what I need to do.
 
Yes, I mean ##F = ma## which is indeed a differential equation for ##v##. Fill in ##ma = m{dv\over dt}## and the two forces acting on ##m##.
 
kornelijepetak said:
The speed of the rigid body during the free fall is given by ##v^2=2gh##, which leads to
##F(v)=kv^2 \Rightarrow F(s)=2kgs##
The work of the air resistance along the fall
##W=\int F(s) \, ds=\int 2kgs\, ds=2kg\int s\,ds=2kg\frac{s^2}{2}=kgs^2##​
This is a valiant attempt to account for energy loss due to air resistance, but it doesn't work.
You start by computing the speed it would have after a fall of a certain distance with no resistance, then find the drag at that point. But it's too late, since it would not have reached that speed. As a result, you overestimate the loss.
As BvU says, you need to start with forces and obtain a differential equation.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top