Conservation of energy of sliding block

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks help with a physics problem involving the conservation of energy for a 38 kg block sliding up a ramp at a 35-degree angle with an initial speed of 7 m/s and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.5. They initially set up the energy equation incorrectly, leading to confusion about the relationship between displacement and height on the slope. After receiving feedback, they realized they had omitted a crucial factor of 1/2 in the kinetic energy formula, which contributed to their incorrect calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles and the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and work done by friction. The user plans to rework the problem with the correct formula.
orionics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

I was trying to work out a problem on conservation of energy and am totally stuck. Was hoping someone could help... the problem was this...

A 38 kg block slides with an initial speed of 7 m/s up a ramp inclined at an angle of 35o with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the ramp is 0.5. Use energy conservation to find the distance the block slides before coming to rest.

I was working with the assumption that at the end of the climb,
PE = KE + Wf
where, PE = potential energy
KE = kinetic energy
Wf = work done by friction = coefficient * Normal force

Reason I get stuck is that there is no d (displacement on slope) or h (height of block at the end of motion). I tried solving one for the other by using h/d = sin theta... but I don't think it's right. :cry:

******EDITED PART STARTS*******
Here's what i had done:
PE = KE - Wf (minus because going up the slope)
mgh = mv2 - (F*d) (F = friction_coeff * m * g * cos theta)

dividing both sides by m*g*d I got...
h/d = (v2/dg) - (F/mg)

but, h/d = sin theta
so,
v2/dg = (F/mg) + sin theta

then I solved for d... and got an answer of 5.1 m. However this was wrong!
******EDITED PART ENDS******

And I've spent an hour on this and am totally frustrated and thus useless ... any and all assistance/clue/guidance will be totally appreciated.

Thanks.

- O
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
orionics said:
I was working with the assumption that at the end of the climb,
PE = KE + Wf
I would write it like this:
{KE}_i + {PE}_i = {KE}_f + {PE}_f + W_{friction}

where, PE = potential energy
KE = kinetic energy
Wf = work done by friction = coefficient * Normal force
The work done by friction will equal \mu N d, where d is what you are trying to find, the distance the block slides.

Reason I get stuck is that there is no d (displacement on slope) or h (height of block at the end of motion). I tried solving one for the other by using h/d = sin theta... but I don't think it's right. :cry:
That relationship between h and d is exactly correct. Now make use of it in the energy equation and solve for d. (Hint: Express the PE in terms of d.)
 
made an addendum

Hey Doc Al

I was editing my previous post when you posted your reply. As you'll notice from my edit of the original post... I think I did what you were asking me to do. I got that answer... but found out that it was wrong.

As for the equation you wrote :
{KE}_i + {PE}_i = {KE}_f + {PE}_f + W_{friction}

Both {PE}_i and {KE}_f are zero... right? That is why I used the equation I had. Am i wrong?

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
orionics said:
Here's what i had done:
PE = KE - Wf (minus because going up the slope)
mgh = mv2 - (F*d) (F = friction_coeff * m * g * cos theta)
Careful: {KE} = 1/2 m v^2. (You are missing a 1/2.)
 
Doc Al said:
Careful: {KE} = 1/2 m v^2. (You are missing a 1/2.)
OMG... I can't believe I did that! :biggrin: .. .and to think I wasted an hour because of a 0.5! I'll try working it out when I get home and see if it's correct.

Thanks a heap!.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top