Conservation of energy of sliding block

AI Thread Summary
A user seeks help with a physics problem involving the conservation of energy for a 38 kg block sliding up a ramp at a 35-degree angle with an initial speed of 7 m/s and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.5. They initially set up the energy equation incorrectly, leading to confusion about the relationship between displacement and height on the slope. After receiving feedback, they realized they had omitted a crucial factor of 1/2 in the kinetic energy formula, which contributed to their incorrect calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying energy conservation principles and the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and work done by friction. The user plans to rework the problem with the correct formula.
orionics
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

I was trying to work out a problem on conservation of energy and am totally stuck. Was hoping someone could help... the problem was this...

A 38 kg block slides with an initial speed of 7 m/s up a ramp inclined at an angle of 35o with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the ramp is 0.5. Use energy conservation to find the distance the block slides before coming to rest.

I was working with the assumption that at the end of the climb,
PE = KE + Wf
where, PE = potential energy
KE = kinetic energy
Wf = work done by friction = coefficient * Normal force

Reason I get stuck is that there is no d (displacement on slope) or h (height of block at the end of motion). I tried solving one for the other by using h/d = sin theta... but I don't think it's right. :cry:

******EDITED PART STARTS*******
Here's what i had done:
PE = KE - Wf (minus because going up the slope)
mgh = mv2 - (F*d) (F = friction_coeff * m * g * cos theta)

dividing both sides by m*g*d I got...
h/d = (v2/dg) - (F/mg)

but, h/d = sin theta
so,
v2/dg = (F/mg) + sin theta

then I solved for d... and got an answer of 5.1 m. However this was wrong!
******EDITED PART ENDS******

And I've spent an hour on this and am totally frustrated and thus useless ... any and all assistance/clue/guidance will be totally appreciated.

Thanks.

- O
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
orionics said:
I was working with the assumption that at the end of the climb,
PE = KE + Wf
I would write it like this:
{KE}_i + {PE}_i = {KE}_f + {PE}_f + W_{friction}

where, PE = potential energy
KE = kinetic energy
Wf = work done by friction = coefficient * Normal force
The work done by friction will equal \mu N d, where d is what you are trying to find, the distance the block slides.

Reason I get stuck is that there is no d (displacement on slope) or h (height of block at the end of motion). I tried solving one for the other by using h/d = sin theta... but I don't think it's right. :cry:
That relationship between h and d is exactly correct. Now make use of it in the energy equation and solve for d. (Hint: Express the PE in terms of d.)
 
made an addendum

Hey Doc Al

I was editing my previous post when you posted your reply. As you'll notice from my edit of the original post... I think I did what you were asking me to do. I got that answer... but found out that it was wrong.

As for the equation you wrote :
{KE}_i + {PE}_i = {KE}_f + {PE}_f + W_{friction}

Both {PE}_i and {KE}_f are zero... right? That is why I used the equation I had. Am i wrong?

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
orionics said:
Here's what i had done:
PE = KE - Wf (minus because going up the slope)
mgh = mv2 - (F*d) (F = friction_coeff * m * g * cos theta)
Careful: {KE} = 1/2 m v^2. (You are missing a 1/2.)
 
Doc Al said:
Careful: {KE} = 1/2 m v^2. (You are missing a 1/2.)
OMG... I can't believe I did that! :biggrin: .. .and to think I wasted an hour because of a 0.5! I'll try working it out when I get home and see if it's correct.

Thanks a heap!.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top