Conservation of Energy on a frictionless incline

AI Thread Summary
A 259 g textbook slides up a 22.1° frictionless incline that is 2.55 m long, and the problem involves calculating the minimum initial speed needed using conservation of energy principles. The height of the incline was calculated using trigonometry, yielding a height of approximately 0.934 m. The kinetic energy at the start equals the potential energy at the top, leading to the equation v = √2gh, resulting in an initial velocity of 4.27 m/s. The initial calculation was incorrect due to mistakenly using 21.5° instead of 22.1°, which was identified and corrected. After addressing the error, the correct answer was confirmed.
Ly444999
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 259 g textbook slides up a 22.1° incline that is 2.55 m long. Using conservation of energy and assuming the incline is frictionless, what minimum initial speed is needed to accomplish this?
mass = 0.259 kg
Θ = 22.1°
length of incline = 2.55 m

Homework Equations


KE = (1/2)*mv2
PE = mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for height of the incline/ramp using trigonometry where the height is opposite to the angle and the length of the ramp is the hypotenuse:
h = 2.55*sin(21.5°) = 0.934

Since the incline is frictionless the kinetic energy at the beginning is equal to the potential energy of when the textbook reaches the top of the ramp:
KE = PE
(1/2)*mv2 = mgh
Isolating for the velocity, the masses cancel out
v = √2gh
v = √(2*9.8*0.934)
= 4.27 m/s

So I got 4.27 m/s as initial velocity but it doesn't match with any of the answers which are either 4.34 m/s, 7.07 m/s, 3.07 m/s or 6.80 m/s.

So I was wondering what I did wrong. Was the velocity I was solving for not initial velocity or was the approach completely wrong? or Did I just make some miscalculations that made it not equal to the first answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ly444999 said:
a 22.1° incline

Ly444999 said:
sin(21.5°)

Notice anything?
 
  • Like
Likes Buffu
haruspex said:
Notice anything?
****, ok I'm very unintelligent, for some reason in my calculations I'm using 21.5 as my degrees I don't know why, thank you for pointing out my obvious mistake though lol.
Edit: I got right answer thank you lol.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top