Conservation of energy, PE & KE problem. help?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving the conservation of energy, specifically the relationship between kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) as a block slides down a frictionless ramp. The user is confused about how to calculate the change in energy between two points and the implications of mechanical energy conservation. It is clarified that the difference in KE between points A and B equals the change in gravitational potential energy, and the equations provided demonstrate how to derive the speed at point B from the speed at point A. The conversation also suggests that using Newton's laws might simplify understanding the problem, emphasizing the importance of recognizing energy transformations. Overall, the key takeaway is that mechanical energy is conserved, and understanding the relationship between KE and PE is crucial for solving the problem.
nchin
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
Conservation of energy, PE & KE problem. help??

a block is sent sliding down a frictionless ramp. Its speeds at points A and B are 2.00 m/s and 2.60 m/s, respectively. Next, it is again sent sliding down the ramp, but this time its speed at point A is 4.00 m/s. What then is its speed at point B?


I understand the first step is to calculate the KE

KE at pt A:
KEa = (1/2) m(2)^2
KEa= 2m*
calculating the KE at pt B:
KEb = (1/2)mv^2
KEb = 3.38m

This part from the solution guide that I'm confused about:
"the difference between the KE at pt B and at pt A is the gravitational potential energy, therefore
Eg = KEb - KEa
Eg = 3.38 - 2m
Eg = 1.38m (m is the mass)"

I don't understand this part!

So PE = KEa - KEb??

Why is that?


And then (this part I also do not understand)
KEa2 = 1/2m(4.00)^(2) = 8m

To get the answer it would be

8m+1.38m=9.38m

1/2mv^(2) = 9.38m
V= 4.33 m/s



I am very confused. Can someone please explain to one to me. Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Point A must be higher than point B. As the block lowers to point B, some PE transforms to added KE.

Mechanical energy is conserved:

KEA + PEA = KEB + PEB

Rearranging, that becomes:
KEB - KEA = PEA - PEB
 


Conceptually (no numbers for now), how is the change in KE of the block related to the change in PE when sliding from a to b? [EDIT: Doc Al posted while I was still typing. Beat me to the punch :)]
 


While I was reading your post, it didn't occur to me to use the method you mentioned. If you are keen to take the energy approach and it works for you, by all means do!

However, the answer you quoted can be reached by just using Newton's laws of motion. Perhaps it would be easier for you to see what is going on in the problem this way?

Although it seems at first that you don't have enough information to fill in all the blanks (u,v,a,s and t) consider that you might be able to include some of these generally (just as letters), because they can be canceled out later.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top