Conservation of Enery (roller coaster)

Carpe Mori
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
ok i this question has been asked but whoever asked it did not show work therefore did not have it answered so here we go my attempt!

Homework Statement



Show that on a roller coaster with a circular vertical loop the difference in your apparent weight at the top of the loop and the bottom of the loop is 6 g's that is 6 times your weight. ignore friction.

h = height of start of roller coaster
R = loop's radius


Homework Equations



PE = KE
a = v^2/R


The Attempt at a Solution



at the top of loop: mgh = mg2R + .5mv^2
solved for velocity v^2 = 2g(h-2R)
centripital acceleration is a = v^2/R ---> a = 2g(h-2R)/R

also i knew from another problem that minimum h had to be 2.5R to be able to go through the whole loop and stay on track so...

a = g? haha yeah i am lost i have no idea what to do. I am trying to teach this course to myself and i am really struggling without a teacher. Please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you have the problem stated correctly? It's pretty easy to show the sum of the apparent weights at the top and bottom is 6mg.
 
yes problem is state correctly and do tell how maybe I am just over thinking it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top