Conservation of flow in a pump

AI Thread Summary
In a simulation involving a surge tank connected to a recirculation loop, the discussion centers on whether a centrifugal pump's flow rate of 500 GPM reflects conservation of mass or volume. It is noted that for incompressible fluids like water, both concepts align since density remains constant. However, the conversation raises concerns about scenarios where density changes, such as with temperature variations in the tank. The key question is whether the pump's flow rate should be considered in terms of volume or mass when density fluctuates. The discussion highlights the complexity of flow measurements in varying conditions, particularly in relation to centrifugal versus positive displacement pumps.
natedogg1002
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I am writing a relatively simple simulation code for looking at transient temperatures in a surge tank, which reflects a real-world system. The tank is hooked up to a recirculation loop with a pump and a heat exchanger. The pump has an average flowrate of 500 GPM. Despite the temperature therefore density of the water it is pumping, the pump moves "500 GPM".

So my question is: When a centrifugal pump has a set flowrate of 500 GPM, is that equivalent to the conservation of mass or conservation of volume?

No amount of Googling seems to have brought me any conclusions, though I have come to understand that positive displacement pumps are different than centrifugal pumps when it comes to this particular topic.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
For water (or any other "incompressible" fluid), the two are the same since density doesn't vary.

In a gas, this would refer only to volume flow rate.
 
Ok, but what if the density does change over time? For example, my tank is hooked up to a recirculating loop with a heat exchanger. As time goes by, the water temperature in the tank rises about 100°F -- corresponding to a change in density of ~2 lb/ft³.

Is the pump actually moving 500 GPM, or the mass equivalent over time?
 
A gallon is a unit of volume, not mass.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top