Conservation of Mass Fluids Wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the continuity equation for a water wave in a channel, where a user questions a discrepancy between their derivation and a textbook version. The user initially derives the equation as $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(b(H+\zeta)u)=0$$ but finds it differs from the book's form. Other participants confirm the user's approach is correct, noting that the textbook's simplification may be valid due to the assumption of a long channel compared to height. Ultimately, the user resolves the issue by relating wave amplitude and velocity, concluding that the terms involving wave amplitude are negligible in comparison to others. This highlights the importance of understanding the assumptions behind simplifications in fluid dynamics equations.
member 428835
Hi PF! Suppose we have a water wave with mean depth ##H## with disturbance ##\zeta## above/below ##H## propagating through a channel of thickness ##b##. The book parenthetically remarks that the continuity equation becomes $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(bHu)=0.$$ However, when I try deriving this I write $$\partial_t(b(H+\zeta) \Delta x )=ub(H+\zeta)|_x-b(H+\zeta)u|_{x+\Delta x}\implies\\
\partial_t(b(H+\zeta))+\partial_x(b(H+\zeta)u)=0$$ which is not quite what they have. Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What you wrote appears correct to me. This is just a standard continuity equation ## \nabla \cdot \vec{J}+\frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}=0 ## if I'm not mistaken. I don't think you can just drop the ## \zeta ## in the second term.
 
Charles Link said:
What you wrote appears correct to me. This is just a standard continuity equation ## \nabla \cdot \vec{J}+\frac{\partial{\rho}}{\partial{t}}=0 ## if I'm not mistaken. I don't think you can just drop the ## \zeta ## in the second term.
The book does, though they do say the channel is very long compared to height. Still, I agree with what you wrote, though I doubt the book made a mistake dropping the ##\zeta## since further work requires their version. Edit: I figured it out: I believe ##\zeta \sim A## where ##A## is wave amplitude. Also, ##u\sim A/P## where ##P## is wave period. Then ##uA\sim O(A^2/P)## and is very small relative to ##O(AL/P)##.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top