Conservation of Momentum - Collisions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a collision problem involving a truck and a car, where the truck's initial and final velocities are provided, and the goal is to determine the car's velocity after the collision using the conservation of momentum. The initial calculations suggest a post-collision speed for the car of approximately 99 km/h, which raises concerns about violating energy conservation principles. Participants agree that while momentum is conserved in the collision, kinetic energy does not have to be conserved, but it cannot increase. The calculations presented indicate discrepancies in energy conservation, suggesting that the results may not be physically plausible. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing collisions and the importance of adhering to the laws of physics.
doug1
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A truck (4 000 kg) runs a red light and enters an intersection traveling at 81 km/h [E]. The truck collides with a car (2
000 kg) that was traveling at 54 km/h [N20oW]. Immediately after the collision the truck was traveling at 60 km/h [N
30o E]. Determine the velocity vector of the car immediately after the collision.


Homework Equations



I used the law of conservation of momentum. I used the concept that momentum is conserved in each component direction.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer that I got was a velocity of approx 99 km/h [E32S]. Can anyone confirm this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This would violate energy conservation, unless the truck or the car have some active system to kick away other vehicles.
I don't understand the notation for the direction, but I would expect that momentum is not conserved either.
 
The notation [N30E] means 30 degrees east of north for example.

Momentum is conserved in this question, but energy is not
 
I agree that kinetic energy does not have to be conserved, but kinetic energy cannot increase in the process.

Working in units of 1000kg*km/h:
to east:
truck initial 4*81=364
car initial -2*54*sin(20°)
truck final 4*60*sin(30°)
car final ~207 or 104 km/h
Hmm... looks wrong.

to north:
truck initial 0
car initial 2*54*cos(20°)
truck final 4*60*cos(30°)
car final -106 or -53km/h

Total energy initially: 2*81^2+1*54^2=16000 (in 1000kg*(km/h)^2)
Total energy finally: 2*60^2+1*(104^2+53^2) = 20800
Clearly this cannot happen in a car accident. The same problem appears with your result of 99km/h total speed as well.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top