Conservation of momentum/energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry3369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
AI Thread Summary
Conservation of momentum can be applied in this scenario, yielding a final angular velocity of 1.2 rev/s, while conservation of energy results in a lower final velocity of 0.69 rev/s. The discrepancy arises because energy conservation does not account for the work done by the skater in pulling their arms in, which increases kinetic energy. Non-conservative forces, like friction, can affect momentum conservation, indicating that external forces can alter the system's dynamics. Therefore, in this case, momentum conservation is the appropriate principle to use. Understanding the distinction between these conservation laws is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/cEqXb24

Homework Equations


Ki = Kf
Li = Lf

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried to solve this using conservation of energy as well as conservation of momentum, but only conservation of momentum gave the correct answer. Why can't conservation of energy be used in this situation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is the work:
Both of these moments of inertia already include the body:
Iinitial = 2.83
Ifinal = 0.9625
ωinitial = 0.40 rev/s

Using conservation of momentum:
Iinitialωinitial = Ifinalωfinal
(2.83)(0.4) = (0.9625)ωfinal
ωfinal = 1.2 rev/s

Using conservation of energy:
Wnon-conservative forces = 0 and no potential energy.
Kinitial = Kfinal
(1/2)Iinitialωinitial2 = (1/2)Ifinalωfinal2
(2.83)(0.402) = (0.9625)(ωfinal2)
ωfinal = 0.69 rev/s
 
Also, if there were a non conservative force such as friction, momentum would not be conserved because it would be an external force.
 
The skater has to do work to bring the arms closer to the body, and this increases the kinetic energy.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top