Conservation of Momentum in Collisions. Help with plots

AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate the Conservation of Momentum in collisions using gliders on an airtrack, the appropriate graphing approach involves plotting the calculated momentum differences. The equation m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f can be rearranged to express the momentum difference as the y-axis, while the x-axis can represent the experiment number. Each experiment will yield a point that should ideally lie close to zero, confirming momentum conservation. Since initial velocities vary, each point will reflect the results of different initial conditions rather than multiple lines on the graph. This method effectively illustrates the principle of momentum conservation across repeated trials.
VyRianS
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is an experiment involving colliding 2 gliders on an airtrack. Initial and final speeds are both recorded. I need to plot a graph that proves the Conservation of Momentum holds true, but I can't seem to get the correct Y and X axis variables. Assuming both masses m1 and m2 are known, how do I go about doing this?

Homework Equations



m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f

The Attempt at a Solution



This only thing I can think of is manipulating the equation so it looks like:

v2f = (m1/m2)(v1i - v1f) + v2i

Thus I'll be taking v2f as my Y-axis, v1i - v1f as my X-axis. However, my constant is the variable v2i, so this model will probably not work...

I'd appreciate all the help given, and thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, both of the initial velocities are constants.
So in your equation, y-axis is V_{2f} and the x-axis is V_{1f}. So the graph would show how the velocity of one glider depends on the velocity of the other.
 
I will be repeating this experiment 5 times, getting different initial speeds each time.

Can it still be graphed the same way, since vis will be different each time?
 
Well, for each repeat of the experiment, you could draw a different line on the graph.
Hopefully each of these lines will have the same gradient, but will intercept the axis in different places.

Edit: actually, If you are only recording the final velocities once for each experiment, then what I've said here won't be helpful, since you wouldn't get several lines, just points.
 
maybe instead you could calculate m_1V_{1i}+m_2V_{2i} - m_1V_{1f} - m_2V_{2f} for each experiment (which should be about zero) and use this as the y axis, and use experiment number as your x-axis. So then you should get 5 points, which should be roughly on the x axis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top