Conservation of momentum in two dimensions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the conservation of momentum in a two-dimensional collision between two balls. Ball A, moving west at 3.0 m/s, collides with stationary Ball B, resulting in Ball A moving south at 2.0 m/s. Participants clarify the momentum calculations, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying vector signs for direction. The correct momentum of Ball B is derived using Pythagorean theorem, yielding a momentum of approximately 3.6 kg*m/s and a velocity of 1.8 m/s. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment that this approach works for this specific case but may not apply to more complex collisions.
twofish
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I'm having a tough time with a below question and would like some hints on where I've gone wrong if my answer is incorrect.
I think the reason it's difficult is because it intuitively doesn't make sense, ...heading 90 degrees south after initially traveling due east, not to mention that it changes the hypotenuse of my vector addition triangle from the Pa to P`b.

Here is the question;

"Ball A, rolling west at 3.0 m/s, has a mass of 1.0 kg. Ball B has a mass of 2.0 kg and is stationary. After colliding with ball B, ball A moves south at 2.0 m/s. Calculate the momentum and velocity of ball B after the collision.

This is my answer and methodology so far..

pa + pb = p`a + p`b (vector sum) with pb = 0
pa = mava = (1.0 kg) * (3.0 m/s) = 3.0 kg*m/s (this is the end total that must be met to satisfy conservation of momentum law)
p`a = ma`+va` = (1.0 kg) * (2.0 m/s) = 2.0kg*m/s

pa_x + pb_x = p`a_x + p`b_x
pa_y + pb_y = p`a_y + p`b_y

now I know the following.
pa_x = 3.0, p`a_x = -3.0 (since ball a is now going due south and has no eastward momentum)
pb_x = 0, p`b_x = ?

pa_y = 0, p`a_y = 2.0 (since ball a is now going due south)
pb_y = 0, p`b_y = -2.0 (since vector sum of vertical components must be 0)



Now I do this, I've changed signs to represent direction of travel for -x, +x, -y and +y ..they should all work out in the end?
pa + pb = p`a + p`b OR (pa_x + pa_y) + (pb_x + pb_y) = (p`a_x + p`a_y) + (p`b_x + p`b_y)
(-3.0 + 0) + (0 + 0) = (-3 + (-2)) + ( X + 2)
X = 0, or p`b_x = 0 ..so I now know that Ball B has no horizontal momentum, in theory.

Great ..do I care? I have no idea where to go from here with this methodology...


Alternatively I don't have to do any of the above save for;
p`a = ma`+av` = (1.0 kg) * (2.0 m/s) = 2.0kg*m/s.
Now I have two sides of a triangle, with pa = 3.0kg*ms and p'a = 2.0kg*m/s, p'b (Hypotenuse) uknown.
By Pythagoras theorem I get.. p'b = \sqrt{13} or (3.6kg*m/s) which is the momentum of ball B.
Divide by 2.0 kg and I get 1.8m/s as the velocity.
Is this correct?
Thanks...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not really sure how to interperet the information above, but the easiest way to do it (which is sort of the same as aove but simpler) is draw a vector diagram at the moment of collision and then find the total momentum vector. THen draw the vector diagram after the collision and draw the same total momentum vector again. You should have two 'known' vectors in your second diagram and one unknown vector. To find the unknown vector, subtract the 'known' balls vector from the net momentum vector.
 
twofish said:
Hi all,
I'm having a tough time with a below question and would like some hints on where I've gone wrong if my answer is incorrect.
I think the reason it's difficult is because it intuitively doesn't make sense, ...heading 90 degrees south after initially traveling due east, not to mention that it changes the hypotenuse of my vector addition triangle from the Pa to P`b.

Here is the question;

"Ball A, rolling west at 3.0 m/s, has a mass of 1.0 kg. Ball B has a mass of 2.0 kg and is stationary. After colliding with ball B, ball A moves south at 2.0 m/s. Calculate the momentum and velocity of ball B after the collision.

This is my answer and methodology so far..

pa + pb = p`a + p`b (vector sum) with pb = 0
pa = mava = (1.0 kg) * (3.0 m/s) = 3.0 kg*m/s (this is the end total that must be met to satisfy conservation of momentum law)
p`a = ma`+va` = (1.0 kg) * (2.0 m/s) = 2.0kg*m/s

pa_x + pb_x = p`a_x + p`b_x
pa_y + pb_y = p`a_y + p`b_y

now I know the following.
pa_x = 3.0, p`a_x = -3.0 (since ball a is now going due south and has no eastward momentum)
No, you don't know that! Assuming that you are setting up a standard coordinate system with positive x to the east and positive y to the north, after the collision p'a_x= 0 because there is neither east nor west momentum. Further, pa_x= -3.0 since west is negative.
pb_x = 0, p`b_x = ?
So -3.0+ 0= 0+ p'b_x. That's easy to solve.
pa_y = 0, p`a_y = 2.0 (since ball a is now going due south)
pb_y = 0, p`b_y = -2.0 (since vector sum of vertical components must be 0)
Better is: p'a_y= -2.0 so 0+ 0= -2.0+ p'b_y and p'b_y= +2.0



Now I do this, I've changed signs to represent direction of travel for -x, +x, -y and +y ..they should all work out in the end?
pa + pb = p`a + p`b OR (pa_x + pa_y) + (pb_x + pb_y) = (p`a_x + p`a_y) + (p`b_x + p`b_y)
(-3.0 + 0) + (0 + 0) = (-3 + (-2)) + ( X + 2)
X = 0, or p`b_x = 0 ..so I now know that Ball B has no horizontal momentum, in theory.
FAR better to "put in the signs" as you calculate the momentum: mv and v has sign corresponding to its direction.

Great ..do I care? I have no idea where to go from here with this methodology...


Alternatively I don't have to do any of the above save for;
p`a = ma`+av` = (1.0 kg) * (2.0 m/s) = 2.0kg*m/s.
Now I have two sides of a triangle, with pa = 3.0kg*ms and p'a = 2.0kg*m/s, p'b (Hypotenuse) uknown.
By Pythagoras theorem I get.. p'b = \sqrt{13} or (3.6kg*m/s) which is the momentum of ball B.
Divide by 2.0 kg and I get 1.8m/s as the velocity.
Is this correct?
Thanks...
For this very simple case where B was not moving and A turned at a right angle, yes, that works. For more general collisions, it might not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okie, thanks much.
I will work on this a little more.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top