Conservation Principle Related to Expanding Space?

jrdev
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Could someone comment on this:

Since space has been expanding since the Big Bang, does this mean there is a conservation principle such that some other property of the universe must be declining? If so, what is that principle and what would be declining?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums jrdev!

1) Pick your theory, and ye shall be answered!
2) If it's GR, then the folk in the SR&GR section of PF will surely give you an answer in a Planck second! (so I'm moving this thread there).
 
If energy is conserved, and space is expanding, than energy density is constantly decreasing (same amount of stuff spread out into a bigger space).

But energy is not conserved in an expanding universe, so oh well.
 
Energy-momentum is conserved in a GR understanding of the universe. If there is no pressure (a dust filled universe) then energy is conserved as measured in the cosmological comoving frame of reference.

The energy of the CMB is not conserved in such a universe as radiation pressure is equal to one third the radiation density.c2.
Garth
 
In the zero energy universe, first suggested by Ed Tryon about 50 years ago, the positive energy is always balanced by the negative potential energy. This leads to a critical density universe, that is, the gravitational potential GM/r is always equal to the Kinetic Energy (1/2M)(v^2). There are however literally hundreds of models of the universe - in some energy is conserved - in others it is not.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top