Conservative Force: Mechanical Energy, f(x) & x Value

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a conservative force acting on a 1.0 kg particle along the x-axis, with the potential energy given by u(x) = -4xe^(-x/4) J. At x = 5.0 m, the particle has a kinetic energy of 2.0 J, leading to a calculated mechanical energy of Emech = -3.73 J. The force as a function of x is derived as fx = (4 - x)e^(-x/4), with participants confirming the calculations and clarifying that fx and Fx refer to the same force. The value of x where fx equals zero is determined to be x = 4. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the context of conservative forces.
hauthuong
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
a single conservative force f(x) acts on a 1.0 kg particles that move along the x axis. the potential energy u(x) associated with f(x) is given by u(x)=-4xe^(-x/4) J, where x is in meters. at x=5.0 m, the particles has a kinetic energy of 2.0J. a) what is the mechanical energy of the system? determine the equation for fx as a function of xfor what x(finite)value of x does fx=0

Emech=K+U
I plugged x=5 into u(x) = -5.73
therefore Emech=2+(-5.73)=-3.73 J Is it right?
for the second one Fx= - du/dx so I come up with fx= (4-x)e^(-x/4)
and I stuck . COuld you guy give me a hint thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about the notation, what is the difference between Fx and fx?
About your calculations, they look ok to me. And about the last question, I don't understand your problem. This one is easier than the others, so maybe you can elaborate on what the problem is.
 
da_willem said:
I'm not sure about the notation, what is the difference between Fx and fx?
About your calculations, they look ok to me. And about the last question, I don't understand your problem. This one is easier than the others, so maybe you can elaborate on what the problem is.
I am sorry for the typo fx and Fx is the same, for the second part : x=4 so the fx=0?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top