Conservative system <-> time independent potential?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between conservative forces and time-independent potential energy. A conservative force is defined as one that can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential function, which must be time-independent for energy to be conserved. The participants clarify that while potential energy can depend on time, this leads to non-conservation of energy, contradicting the definition of conservative forces. The conversation highlights the importance of precise terminology in physics, particularly in distinguishing between conservative forces and time-dependent potentials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces in classical mechanics
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Basic grasp of gradient operations in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time-dependent potentials in classical mechanics
  • Explore the concept of Lagrangian mechanics in detail
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of conservative forces
  • Investigate examples of systems with time-independent and time-dependent forces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and researchers interested in classical mechanics, particularly those focusing on the principles of conservative forces and energy conservation.

Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Is it possible that the potential energy depends on the time and the system is conservative?

Let me elaborate. Consider a function ##U(\vec{r},t)## and consider the case where the forces in space at any moment are given by ##\vec{F}=-\nabla{U}##. So in this case, according to the definition of conservative, the force field is conservative.

However the energy is time dependent ( since the Lagrangian would be time dependent the energy is not conserved ).

QUESTION: Often I have seen conservative and time-independent potential energy used interchangably. As you see, it seems to be not the case. So what's the real connection between conservative and time independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.
 
AlephNumbers said:
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.

What? I'm not sure I follow. The potential energy in that case is only a function of the position, not time explicitly.
 
assed said:
Yes, Cofee_ you are right. the case mentioned by AlephNumbers does not fit your case.
Answering your question, a conservative force is related to a time independent potential because if that is not the case energy is not conserved.
Take a look at this :
http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...me-dependent-classical-system-be-conservative
Yes I understand that energy is not conserved, but what about the definitions of a conservative force as :

"A force is conservative if there exists a function of which the force is a gradient" : See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force
 
Oh...so all you are worried about is nomenclature. Call it what you want, I call a conservative force a force that results in conservation of energy and one necessary condition is that it can be written a the gradient of a time-independent scalar function.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K