Conservative system <-> time independent potential?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between conservative forces and time-dependent potential energy. The original poster questions whether a potential energy function can be time-dependent while still allowing for a conservative force field, leading to an exploration of definitions and implications in classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of conservative forces and their connection to potential energy, questioning whether time-dependent potentials can still yield conservative forces. There is a reference to specific examples, such as a mass-spring system, to illustrate points of confusion.

Discussion Status

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of conservative forces, while others attempt to clarify the relationship between conservative forces and time-independent potentials. References to external sources are made to support various viewpoints, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of terminology and definitions within the context of classical mechanics, particularly regarding energy conservation and the characteristics of conservative forces.

Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Is it possible that the potential energy depends on the time and the system is conservative?

Let me elaborate. Consider a function ##U(\vec{r},t)## and consider the case where the forces in space at any moment are given by ##\vec{F}=-\nabla{U}##. So in this case, according to the definition of conservative, the force field is conservative.

However the energy is time dependent ( since the Lagrangian would be time dependent the energy is not conserved ).

QUESTION: Often I have seen conservative and time-independent potential energy used interchangably. As you see, it seems to be not the case. So what's the real connection between conservative and time independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.
 
AlephNumbers said:
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.

What? I'm not sure I follow. The potential energy in that case is only a function of the position, not time explicitly.
 
assed said:
Yes, Cofee_ you are right. the case mentioned by AlephNumbers does not fit your case.
Answering your question, a conservative force is related to a time independent potential because if that is not the case energy is not conserved.
Take a look at this :
http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...me-dependent-classical-system-be-conservative
Yes I understand that energy is not conserved, but what about the definitions of a conservative force as :

"A force is conservative if there exists a function of which the force is a gradient" : See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force
 
Oh...so all you are worried about is nomenclature. Call it what you want, I call a conservative force a force that results in conservation of energy and one necessary condition is that it can be written a the gradient of a time-independent scalar function.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K