Conservative system <-> time independent potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between conservative forces and time-dependent potential energy. It highlights that while a force can be derived from a potential function, if that potential is time-dependent, energy is not conserved. Participants clarify that conservative forces are typically associated with time-independent potentials, as energy conservation is a key characteristic. The conversation also touches on the definitions of conservative forces, emphasizing that they must be expressible as the gradient of a scalar function. Ultimately, the distinction between conservative forces and time-dependent potentials is critical for understanding energy conservation in physical systems.
Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Is it possible that the potential energy depends on the time and the system is conservative?

Let me elaborate. Consider a function ##U(\vec{r},t)## and consider the case where the forces in space at any moment are given by ##\vec{F}=-\nabla{U}##. So in this case, according to the definition of conservative, the force field is conservative.

However the energy is time dependent ( since the Lagrangian would be time dependent the energy is not conserved ).

QUESTION: Often I have seen conservative and time-independent potential energy used interchangably. As you see, it seems to be not the case. So what's the real connection between conservative and time independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.
 
AlephNumbers said:
A mass attached to a spring that is allowed to oscillate up and down (in the absence of air resistance) seems to fit your parameters.

What? I'm not sure I follow. The potential energy in that case is only a function of the position, not time explicitly.
 
assed said:
Yes, Cofee_ you are right. the case mentioned by AlephNumbers does not fit your case.
Answering your question, a conservative force is related to a time independent potential because if that is not the case energy is not conserved.
Take a look at this :
http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...me-dependent-classical-system-be-conservative
Yes I understand that energy is not conserved, but what about the definitions of a conservative force as :

"A force is conservative if there exists a function of which the force is a gradient" : See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_force
 
Oh...so all you are worried about is nomenclature. Call it what you want, I call a conservative force a force that results in conservation of energy and one necessary condition is that it can be written a the gradient of a time-independent scalar function.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top