Considering a Busy Course Load for Next Semester: A Student's Dilemma

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on evaluating a proposed course load for the next semester, which includes classical mechanics, E&M II, thermodynamics, a lab class, abstract algebra I, and philosophy of mind. The individual is currently managing five classes with good grades but is concerned about the increased difficulty and time commitment of the new schedule. Key points include the uncertainty of the E&M II syllabus and its relevance to prior coursework, as well as the potential impact of taking abstract algebra without having completed linear algebra. Participants emphasize the importance of personal learning styles and past experiences with course loads, suggesting that a smaller number of challenging classes may lead to better understanding and retention. They caution against underestimating the time commitment of seemingly easier classes like philosophy and question the benefits of taking on an additional class at the risk of increased stress and diminished learning quality. Overall, the consensus leans towards a more manageable course load, encouraging consultation with academic advisors for tailored advice.
ASZarathustra
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
So I recently signed up for classes this semester, and have everything down except one class. This semester, I'm taking modern physics, electricity and magnetism, differential equations, intro to advanced math (essentially an intro to proof class, along with a little basic set theory), and logic. I currently have A's in all those classes except for E&M (depends on the curve; although at the lowest, I have a B).

For next semester, I want to take classical mechanics, E&M II, thermodynamics, lab (it's the first lab class for majors), abstract algebra I, and philosophy of mind (I do want to take something that's not physics or math, and I don't anticipate this being an overly demanding class).

So, my question is, is this a doable course load? If so, will I have any time at the end of the day?

Information that may help:

I haven't taken linear algebra yet. Should I wait on abstract algebra then? (I plan on taking it in the summer to lighten the load a little bit; abstract algebra isn't offered in the summer).
E&M II is not a required class, but I want to take it, and I don't know if they'll offer it next spring (the physics department rotates higher level classes at random; for all intents and purposes, I don't expect them to offer it next spring). Should I take the time to take it?
How hard and time-consuming are each of the physics classes listed?

Thanks in advance to all who answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does your advisor think of this plan?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What does your advisor think of this plan?

He was the first person I asked. All he said was that it depended on myself and how much I could handle. I guess I just answered my own question, but I would like a solid answer.
 
ASZarathustra said:
I guess I just answered my own question, but I would like a solid answer.
I don't think there is a sold answer.
In my experience it depends on an lot of things. This would include whether each lecturers teaching style matches how I personally learn best. Timetabling eg if I have three consecutive hours of lectures then the third hour is pretty much a write off in terms of information absorbed. Mainly, it depends on whether I have an intuitive grasp on the subject.
 
ASZarathustra said:
I would like a solid answer.

I don't think there is a solid answer. How long is a piece of string?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't think there is a solid answer. How long is a piece of string?

Alright. Could you at least answer the first two questions I made at the bottom (disregard the last one, as billy_joule made a good point)? That might help me decide quicker.
 
The problem is that "E&M II" doesn't tell us what the class syllabus is, or what you were taught in E&M I, or what the mathematical expectations are. Similarly, Linear Algebra has a lot of variation - my class was largely proof-based and would have been helpful bnefore Abstract. Others I know too classes that focused on numerical methods, and would have been of little help for Abstract. That's why I tried to point you to your advisor - he knows these things. We would be guessing.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The problem is that "E&M II" doesn't tell us what the class syllabus is, or what you were taught in E&M I, or what the mathematical expectations are. Similarly, Linear Algebra has a lot of variation - my class was largely proof-based and would have been helpful bnefore Abstract. Others I know too classes that focused on numerical methods, and would have been of little help for Abstract. That's why I tried to point you to your advisor - he knows these things. We would be guessing.

(This description goes by Griffith's book, if that helps) E&M I covers electrostatics, electric fields in matter, magnetostatics, electrodynamics (i.e. emf and inductions), conservation laws (i.e. Poynting vecotr), and electromagnetic waves. E&M II will cover potentials and fields, radiation, and relativistic electrodynamics, as well as a little introductory plasma material. Linear algebra, from what I understand, is half computation (matrices and determinants), and half "proof"-like (vector spaces, linear transformations, orthogonality, and eigenvalues, although I don't know how much each topic here is weighted).
 
What has worked well for you in the past in terms of course load. I personally learn the most when I can focus on a small number of things. In theory this might mean I learn less overall. But if you focus on a topic you tend to pick up a bunch of generally useful things. As an example studying numerical PDE leads to some graph theory, learning measure theory might lead you to Ordinal numbers if you think about the Borel Hierarchy.

On the other hand many people learn more when they take high class loads. You should choose the course load that has, in the past, lead to maximal learning for you.
 
  • #10
deluks917 said:
What has worked well for you in the past in terms of course load. I personally learn the most when I can focus on a small number of things. In theory this might mean I learn less overall. But if you focus on a topic you tend to pick up a bunch of generally useful things. As an example studying numerical PDE leads to some graph theory, learning measure theory might lead you to Ordinal numbers if you think about the Borel Hierarchy.

On the other hand many people learn more when they take high class loads. You should choose the course load that has, in the past, lead to maximal learning for you.

You see, this will have been the most I have taken. I took 4 classes (14 hours) the first semesters, and am taking 5 classes (15 hours) right now. My schedule would have 6 classes (18 hours). I'm doing fine in 5 right now, but I'm concerned about the difficulty of the classes next semester, and the jump from 5 to 6.
 
  • #11
In this case imo, it is probably not a good idea both to increase the difficulty and the number of the classes you are taking. My guess would be you are best off with CM + EM2 + thermo lab + 1 other class. But I agree you should talk to a faculty advisor.
 
  • #12
Two points:

1. Don't underestimate courses like philosophy. Even if they're easy, they can still take up a lot of your time. (Writing essays, memorizing a bunch of stuff by rote, etc.) I made this mistake once and ended up having to withdraw from the class.
2. What do you gain by taking 6 courses instead of 5? If your grades don't take a hit, you're at very least going to be more stressed. Also, even if you do well grade-wise, you still might not learn as much as you'd like to in some classes because you're juggling too many other classes. So the logical question is, what do you gain by doing extra classes? Is it worth the probable stress and reduced quality of your education?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
6K
Back
Top