Constant Acceleration of car over distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a car that accelerates and brakes with constant acceleration. The key questions are about the time taken to cover a distance (L) under two scenarios: not reaching maximum velocity (v) and reaching it. Confusion arises regarding how the car can reach maximum velocity if it doesn't in the first scenario, given constant acceleration and distance. Clarification suggests that both scenarios need to be solved independently, as the conditions of distance, acceleration, and maximum velocity are not predetermined. Understanding both cases is essential for a complete solution to the problem.
Mglafas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to do the following problem:

A car can accelerate and brake with constant acceleration, both with the magnitude (a). The car has a maximum velocity (v). The car needs to cover the distance (L), starting and ending at rest.

a) How long will it take the car to cover the distance if the maximum velocity (v) is NOT reached?

b) How long will it take the car to cover the distance if the maximum velocity (v) IS reached?



I only become increasingly confused the more I try to understand this question. If the car does not reach its maximum velocity in the first question, then how will it do so in the second when the acceleration and distance is a constant?

If I ignore (v), then i get this:
S=0.5at^2
(L/2)=0.5at^2
t=sqrt(aL)

Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mglafas said:
If the car does not reach its maximum velocity in the first question, then how will it do so in the second when the acceleration and distance is a constant?

I think what they meant in the questions is (a) solve it IF the car does not reach maximum velocity, (b) solve it IF the car does reach maximum velocity.
so you don't know what are L,a,v, so you don't know which one is true, therefore you must solve both cases, but you can't say (a) is true and (b) is not.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top