Calculating Time for Constant Acceleration: Motorcycle Velocity Change

AI Thread Summary
A motorcycle with a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s² needs to change its speed from 40.9 to 50.9 m/s and from 70.9 to 80.9 m/s. The kinematic equation Vf = Vi + a*t is used to calculate the time required for these changes. An initial attempt incorrectly combined terms, leading to an incorrect solution of 4.04 seconds. The correct approach involves isolating the term with time (t) before solving. Proper algebraic manipulation is essential for accurate calculations in physics problems.
Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A motorcycle has a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s2. Both the velocity and acceleration of the motorcycle point in the same direction. How much time is required for the motorcycle to change its speed from (a)40.9 to 50.9 m/s, and (b)70.9 to 80.9 m/s?
[/B]

Homework Equations


Vf = Vi + a*t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


using that kinematic formula,
for a) 50.9=40.9+2.8*t
then divide both sides by 40.9+2.8 to solve for t
answer = 4.04[/B]
and same thing with b) but in both cases the answer is coming up as wrong. what have i done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Erenjaeger said:

Homework Statement


A motorcycle has a constant acceleration of 2.80 m/s2. Both the velocity and acceleration of the motorcycle point in the same direction. How much time is required for the motorcycle to change its speed from (a)40.9 to 50.9 m/s, and (b)70.9 to 80.9 m/s?
[/B]

Homework Equations


Vf = Vi + a*t[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


using that kinematic formula,
for a) 50.9=40.9+2.8*t
then divide both sides by 40.9+2.8 to solve for t
answer = 4.04[/B]
and same thing with b) but in both cases the answer is coming up as wrong. what have i done wrong?
You should check your algebra.

50.9 = 40.9 + 2.8t

is not the same thing as

50.9 = (40.9 + 2.8)t.

And for that matter, neither one gives an answer of 4.04 sec. So I'm not really sure what happened there.

(Hint, you can't just add 40.9 plus 2.8 that way. That's not the way algebra works.)
 
collinsmark said:
You should check your algebra.

50.9 = 40.9 + 2.8t

is not the same thing as

50.9 = (40.9 + 2.8)t.

And for that matter, neither one gives an answer of 4.04 sec. So I'm not really sure what happened there.

(Hint, you can't just add 40.9 plus 2.8 that way. That's not the way algebra works.)
oh right, so basically i have to get 2.8t on its own and then divide by 2.8??
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Erenjaeger said:
oh right, so basically i have to get 2.8t on its own and then divide by 2.8??
Yes, that is the correct way. :smile:
 
collinsmark said:
Yes, that is the correct way. :smile:
cool thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes Kuzon and collinsmark
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top