Constant acceleration proof, dv/dt=a

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of constant acceleration and the relationship between velocity and acceleration. The equation v = v0 + at is highlighted, with emphasis on its derivative, which should yield dv/dt = a. A participant initially misinterprets the derivative, thinking it involves the product of two variables, but later realizes that both a and v0 are constants. This clarification helps them understand that the derivative simplifies to a, reinforcing the concept of constant acceleration. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the initial misunderstanding and a renewed clarity on the topic.
Beamsbox
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
My book has stumped me on something that I thought should be simple... perhaps I'm just not getting it.

Section - Constant Acceleration

It states the following:

"When acceleration is constant, the average acceleration and instantaneous acceleration are equal and we can write...

a = aavg = (v-v0)/(t-0)

Here v0 is the velocity at time t = 0 and v is the velocity at any later time t. We can recast this equation as:

v = v0 + at (Eq. 2-11)

As a check, note that this equation reduces to v = v0 for t = 0, as it must. As a further check, take the derivative of Eq. 2-11. Doing so yields dv/dt = a, which is the definition of a."

I'm not catching the last (bold) part. The derivative of equation 2-11 being equal to a.

When I work out the derivative (in my mind) is should work like this:

dv/dt = at
=a't + at'
=1(t) + a(1)
= t + a

My mind is leaning towards the idea that the book is trying say that dv/dt = a, at t = 0. Is that what the book is trying to tell me? Because I think I'm just confusing myself.

Any proof of this would probably help me out.

Thanks, prior!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the derivative of f(t)=2 with respect to t? The derivative of f(t)=c, where c is some constant? Here, a is just another constant.
 
Yeah I'm not really sure why you think this:

dv/dt = at
=a't + at'
=1(t) + a(1)
= t + a

works.

Here's how you should see it. Equation 2-11 shows v as a function of time with initial velocity v0. In other words,

v(t) = v = v0 + at

Take the first derivative with respect to time. v0 is a constant and derivative of a constant is zero. a is also a constant and the derivative of a constant times a variable is the constant itself. So...

v'(t) = a
 
That did it, I was thinking of at as being the product of two variables... instead of say, dv/dt = 6t = 6 for example... now THAT I can understand.

Thanks for the help, it's been a few years...
 
Beamsbox said:
That did it, I was thinking of at as being the product of two variables... instead of say, dv/dt = 6t = 6 for example... now THAT I can understand.

Thanks for the help, it's been a few years...

Ah I see so you were using the product rule to get = t + a

Well, good that you understand now :)
 
Funny actually, now that I think about it, I'm in the CONSTANT ACCELERATION section... CONSTANT... doh!

Thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top