Constructing a Circuit to Limit Voltage of 20V Peak-to-Peak Sine Wave

AI Thread Summary
To construct a circuit that limits a 20V peak-to-peak sine wave to 5.6V on the positive side and -2.5V on the negative side, a diode clipper circuit can be utilized. The positive clipper can be set up with a diode connected to a +5V rail, while the negative side requires careful consideration of available voltage rails, as a -1.9V rail is unconventional. The discussion emphasizes that the output should be clipped rather than scaled, focusing on achieving the specified voltage limits. It is suggested that a transistor and two resistors could be used to create the necessary negative clamp. Proper schematic conventions should be followed for clarity in circuit design.
laminatedevildoll
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
How do I construct a circuit that will limit the positive half of a 20V peak-to-peak sine wave to 5.6V and the negative half to -2.5V?

So far, I have a 1 k ohm resistor and the diode is forward biased leading to VL and Vout.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What voltage rails do you have available? Is the resulting waveform supposed to be a scaled version of the input waveform, or just clipped on top and bottom to the voltages you mention? Can it be scaled and clipped, or is it not supposed to be scaled before clipping? What are the input characteristics of whatever you are feeding your output waveform into?
 
For instance, I attempted to draw the diode clipper circuit which gives out a 5V instead. The input graph is suppposed to be a sine wave and the output is supposed to be a cut off at the top of the wave.

I am not sure if it is supposed to be scaled or not, but I am thinking no.
 

Attachments

  • diode.JPG
    diode.JPG
    7.4 KB · Views: 511
laminatedevildoll said:
For instance, I attempted to draw the diode clipper circuit which gives out a 5V instead. The input graph is suppposed to be a sine wave and the output is supposed to be a cut off at the top of the wave.
I am not sure if it is supposed to be scaled or not, but I am thinking no.
That looks right for the positive side clipper. BTW, the usual convention is to draw the positive rails at the upper side of the schematic, and the negative rails at the bottom part of the schematic. So in your sketch, draw the positive catch diode pointing up, with its cathode connected to +5V at the top of the page.

Now you just need the negative clipper. That's why I asked about what voltage rails you can assume that you have. Clamping at 5.6V is pretty straightforward, since that's just about a diode drop above a 5V rail. But clamping at -2.5V is a little weird, since having a -1.9V rail to clamp to would be pretty non-standard. You can make a diode clamp of any voltage drop with a transistor and two resistors, so maybe that's what they are looking for.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top