Construction of a cyclic sequence re the Golden Ratio

ramsey2879
Messages
841
Reaction score
3
The fractal sequence http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A054065
is of interest because it provides permutations of the numbers 1-n such
that the decimal part of k*tau (k = {1,2,3,...n} is ordered from the
lowest possible value to the highest. For instance if n = 3 the
permutation is 2,1,3 since .2360 < .6180 <.8541. (3*(1 + sqrt5)/2 =
4.8541..). However, other than calculating the decimal parts for each
k*tau and sorting the list no algorithm is provided for obtaining the
proper permutation of the numbers 1-n.
I have the algorithm to share with you.
Let F(odd) be the highest fibonacci number less or equal to n and F(2b)
be the highest even fibonacci number less than n.
start with k = F(odd) since of the numbers 1-n, k=F(odd) provides the
lowest possible decimal part for k*tau. Now follow the two rules below
in the order listed to get the subsequent terms in the permutation:
1. add F(odd) if the resulting value is less than F(odd+2)
2. subtract F(2b)
If the result of the first operation yields a number higher then you want in the permutation omit it. It would have been a part of the permutation
if n was chosen to be as larger such as F(odd+2)-1, however, so you can choose
to leave it in if you prefer to increase the number of terms in the
permutation instead. But even if you omit it continue the algorithm as
though it was included to get the next n in the permutation.
I said the permutation was cyclic because in fact you could start
with any number up to n and follow the above 2 rules to get all n
numbers in the permutation as though you were going around a clock only
you started at 6 instead of at 1.
I hope I didn't bore you with this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ramsey2879 said:
The fractal sequence http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A054065
is of interest because it provides permutations of the numbers 1-n such
that the decimal part of k*tau (k = {1,2,3,...n} is ordered from the
lowest possible value to the highest. For instance if n = 3 the
permutation is 2,1,3 since .2360 < .6180 <.8541. (3*(1 + sqrt5)/2 =
4.8541..). However, other than calculating the decimal parts for each
k*tau and sorting the list no algorithm is provided for obtaining the
proper permutation of the numbers 1-n.
I have the algorithm to share with you.
QUOTE]
Even better
given 0 \leq i \leq F_{2n} where F_{2n} is an even term in the Fibonacci sequence, then the fractional parts of i*tau denoted as {i*tau} when put in ascending order have each term put into the position i*F_{2n-1} \mod F_{2n}
Thus for n = 3, F(2n) = 8 F(2n-1) = 5 Then mod 8
0*5 mod 8 = 0 {0*tau} = .000...
5*5 mod 8 = 1 {5*tau} = .090...
2*5 mod 8 = 2 {2*tau} = .236...
7*5 mod 8 = 3 {7*tau} = .326...
4*5 mod 8 = 4 {4*tau} = .472...
1*5 mod 8 = 5 {1*tau} = .61803..
6*5 mod 8 = 6 {6*tau} = .708...
3*5 mod 8 = 7 {3*tau} = .854...
8*5 mod 8 = 8 {8*tau} = .944...

As n increases \{F_{2n}*tau \} approaches .999... . For instance F(16) = 987
{987*tau} = .99954..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even better
given 0 \leq i \leq F_{2n} where F_{2n} is an even term in the Fibonacci sequence, then the fractional parts of i*tau denoted as {i*tau} when put in ascending order have each term put into the position i*F_{2n-1} \mod F_{2n}
Thus for n = 3, F(2n) = 8 F(2n-1) = 5 Then mod 8
0*5 mod 8 = 0 {0*tau} = .000... 0*5-0*3 =0
5*5 mod 8 = 1 {5*tau} = .090... 5*5-3*8 = 1
2*5 mod 8 = 2 {2*tau} = .236... 2*5-1*8 = 2 ...6-5 = 1
7*5 mod 8 = 3 {7*tau} = .326... 7*5-4*8 = 3 ...9-5 = 4
4*5 mod 8 = 4 {4*tau} = .472... 4*5-2*8 = 4 ...12-10= 2
1*5 mod 8 = 5 {1*tau} = .61803..1*5-0*8=5 ...15 - 15 = 0
6*5 mod 8 = 6 {6*tau} = .708...6*5-3*8=6 ...18-15 = 3
3*5 mod 8 = 7 {3*tau} = .854...3*5-1*8=7 ...21-20 = 1
8*5 mod 8 = 8 {8*tau} = .944...8*5-4*8=8 ...24 -20= 4

Since it is known that F(2n-2)*F(2n+2) + 1 = F(n-1)^2 and tau is sightly greater than F(2n)/F(n-1) the above relation follows from multiplying this equation by i = 1,2,3,4... and reducing mod 8 and mod 5 respectively

As n increases \{F_{2n}*tau \} approaches .999... . For instance F(16) = 987
{987*tau} = .99954..
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
2
Replies
61
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Replies
33
Views
8K
Back
Top