Construction of an equivalent dielectric tensor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on constructing an equivalent dielectric tensor K_{ij}(\omega, \textbf{k}) using the response functions ε(ω) and μ^{-1}(ω). Key equations provided include the relationships between electric displacement D, electric field E, magnetic field H, and magnetic induction B. A user expresses confusion about how to begin the problem, prompting another participant to share relevant equations and suggest that the remaining steps should be straightforward. The conversation also hints at a shared academic context, indicating that participants may be working from the same textbook and course. Overall, the thread emphasizes the mathematical relationships necessary for solving the problem.
billybomb87
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A medium is described by the response functions \varepsilon (\omega ) and {\mu ^{ - 1}}(\omega ) in

\textbf{D} = \varepsilon (\omega )\textbf{E}, \textbf{H} = {\mu ^{ - 1}}(\omega )\textbf{B}.

Construct the equivalent dielectric tensor {K_{ij}}(\omega ,\textbf{k}) in terms of \varepsilon (\omega ) and {\mu ^{ - 1}}(\omega )

Homework Equations



\textbf{D} = \varepsilon (\omega )\textbf{E}

\textbf{H} = {\mu ^{ - 1}}(\omega )\textbf{B}

\textbf{P} = {\varepsilon _0}{\chi ^e}\textbf{E}

\textbf{M} = {\chi ^m}\textbf{B}/{\mu _0}

{P_i} = {\varepsilon _0}\chi _{ij}^e{E_j}

{M_i} = \chi _{ij}^m{B_j}/{\mu _0}

The Attempt at a Solution



I seriously have no idea. I know what the answer should be but I only need a push in the right direction. Dont know where to start or how to attack the problem. All help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi! I actually did this one just a moment ago. I guess you are also solving exercise 6.1 in Melrose, McPhedran's book "Electromagnetic processes in dispersive media". :) You should use the following equations:

<br /> K_{i,j}(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \delta_{ij} + \frac{i}{\omega \epsilon_0}\sigma_{ij}(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> \left(\textbf{J}_{ind}\right)_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \sigma_{ij}(\omega, \textbf{k})E_j(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> \left(\textbf{J}_{ind}\right)_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = -i\omega P_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) + i \epsilon_{ijk}k_j M_k(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> P_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = D_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) - \epsilon_0 E_i(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> D_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \epsilon(\omega)E_i(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> M_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \frac{1}{\mu_0}B_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) - H_i(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> H_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \mu^{-1}(\omega)B_i(\omega, \textbf{k})

<br /> B_i(\omega, \textbf{k}) = \frac{1}{\omega}\epsilon_{ijk}k_j E_k(\omega, \textbf{k})

Then I guess the rest is straightforward. Good luck!
 
Btw, is it possible that you also take T. Hellsten's course at KTH and have this exercise as a deadline until next thursday? Just wondering. :)
 
Back
Top