Continuity of a Function with Inverse Preimage Condition

  • Thread starter Thread starter fraggle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
fraggle
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose f:X-->Y
suppose for each open set U in Y s.t U contains some element f(x), we have f^(-1)(U) is open in X.
Does this imply f is continuous

Homework Equations


U is not quite an arbitrary open set of Y since there could be an open set of Y that does not interesct the image f(X).
Suppose V is such a set.
Then can we say f^(-1)(V)= the empty set? Or is it just undefined?

This isn't a homework question, just curious.



The Attempt at a Solution


I believe it is continuous since, otherwise the proof I'm reading in a textbook wouldn't work (they just ommited this part).

Could anyone explain the reasoning for this?
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right since if the open set U didn't contain the image of any point in X, then f-1(U) would be empty (since nothing in X was mapped to U), and the empty set is an open set. So they are just excluding that case since it doesn't really carry any information with it.

Also, this version of continuity is equivalent to the epsilon-delta definition of continuity, as well as a few other versions. For example, if for every closed set in Y, f inverse of that closed set is closed in X, then f is continuous. You can prove it from the above statement by taking complements.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top