Continuity of piecewise defined trig functions

k3k3
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Define functions f and g on [-1,1] by

f(x) = xcos(1/x) if x≠0 and 0 if x = 0

g(x)= cos(1/x) if x≠0 and 0 if x = 0

(These are piecewise defined. I don't know how to type them in here.)

Prove that f is continuous at 0 and that g is not continuous at 0. Explain why these functions are continuous at every other point in [-1,1].

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Using the definition of continuity,

Suppose g is continuous at x=0.

Since g is continuous for all x in [-1,1], then for all ε>0, there exists a δ > 0 such that |g(x)-g(c)| < ε for all x in [-1,1] that satisfy |x-c| < δ

Let ε=1/2
Let c = 0
Choose δ=ε

Then |g(x)-g(c)| = |cos(1/x)| and since -1 ≤ cos(1/x) ≤ 1 for all x in [-1,1], then |cos(1/x)|≤|2x|<2δ=2/2=1

Then if x=3/\pi, |cos(1/x)| = |1/2| < 1/2 which 1/2 cannot be less than itself. So there exists a ε where the continuity definition fails at c=0 and thus g(x) is not continuous on [-1,1].

Is this correct for showing g(x) is not continuous at x=0?

I am unsure how to show f(x) is continuous at x=0 since it is a product of two functions where one of them is not continuous at 0.

I have a theorem that will help me with showing that trig functions are continuous if they are defined on their domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't understand your argument for proving that g is not continuous at 0. I don't think it's right. Can you show that in any neighborhood around x = 0, g(x) takes on the values +1 and -1 for infinitely many x? Can you use that fact to show that g is not continuous at 0?

To show that f is continuous at 0, try sandwiching it between two continuous functions which both have the same value at x = 0.
 
Are you really required to do an "epsilon-delta" proof? It is relatively straight forward to find the limits of both f and g (or show they don't exist) as x goes to 0.
 
Jbunnlll, if I understand what you are saying, I was trying to use that fact to make a contradiction using the definition of continuity.

Hallsofivy, we aren't required to use the epsilon-delta definiton. It should work for any case, so I was really testing my knowledge on the definiton. I will try your suggestion. Sounds a lot easier!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top