Continuous Charge Distribution?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of continuous charge distribution, particularly in the context of a charged metal ball. It highlights that while charge appears uniformly distributed on the surface, atomic-level analysis reveals that this uniformity is disrupted by the discrete nature of protons and electrons. The net charge, composed of these smaller charges, leads to a non-uniform distribution when viewed at an atomic scale. However, for most practical applications, this atomic-level variation can be ignored due to the negligible spacing between atomic charges. The conversation questions the necessity of mentioning atomic-level uniformity without further analysis, suggesting it may not be relevant for typical scenarios.
wajed
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
http://www.vias.org/physics/bk4_06_07.html

This is a quote from the mentioned website,

" For example, a charged metal ball will have charge spread nearly uniformly all over its surface, and in for most purposes it will make sense to ignore the fact that this uniformity is broken at the atomic level"

May I know how is that uniformity broken at the atomic level?
Also, may I know,exactly, when/how does it make sense to ignore that fact for most cases?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
teh charge distribution is caused by the net charge, either positive or negative, comprised of either protons or electrons.

The reason the net charge is not uniform at the atomic level is because the net charge is made up of a bunch of smaller charges (either protons or electrons) bunched up close together. If you viewed the surface at the atomic level, it would look like a bunch of small pieces really close together, eg:

.........

and not like:

___________________________

if it were the latter, then uniformity would not be broken at the atomic level, however we know that the latter is not possible as everything is comprised of atoms.

Honestly it seems stupid that the site even mentioned that, unless it goes into atomic analysis of the charged structure...ive never even seen that mentioned anywhere, as teh spacing between atomic charges is negligible for almost all purposes.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Back
Top