Control engineering Vs. Communication enginering

AI Thread Summary
Control engineering focuses on closed-loop feedback design and is often more electronics-oriented, while communication engineering involves RF circuitry and complex mathematical calculations for system throughput. The discussion highlights that control engineering may not be as challenging as RF and microwave electronics design, which many find rewarding. Personal interest should guide specialization choices rather than job opportunities, as these can fluctuate. The importance of understanding oneself in choosing a field is emphasized, with suggestions to explore job sites for insights on opportunities and salaries. Ultimately, a blend of both fields could provide a well-rounded skill set.
track
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Question is simple. Your opinion all round?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What do you mean by communication engineering? Do you mean designing RF circuitry for wireless communication, or more into the band and bandwidth, modulations like QAM, OFDM etc.?

Control engineering is more about closed loop feedback design, it usually is more electronics oriented except on slower system that people use software to do the closed loop control. It is not the most challenging type of design. Nothing like the RF and microwave electronics design.

If it is like the modulations and calculate QAM etc which I am not very familiar. Seems like it is more about calculation of the system through put, It involve math like Fourier Transform, Probability, Statistic, etc. Not exactly very deep into electronics. Excuse me if I have this one wrong. I read a little into this and I was stopped because I forgot most of the probality and never really get into statistics. Knowing Fourier Transform is not enough for me to understand the detail of calculating bit error rate and all. I am more the electronics person and I loss interest after a while on this.

If you refer to is RF, then I feel that is the most interesting. I spend quite a few years studying EM and RF circuitry design. I find this is the most challenging( difficult) and rewarding.

Bottom line is choose what you like, don't choose by the job opportunity as it change from time to time. What I wrote is basically on my own interest that might not apply to you.
 
I share your taught, none of the areas are not specified tight, so... that's why I need all round (or wide) opinion. Job opportunities, salary, best specialisation, etc...
 
track said:
I share your taught, none of the areas are not specified tight, so... that's why I need all round (or wide) opinion. Job opportunities, salary, best specialisation, etc...

Look at job sites to find out about job opportunities and salary. But still, go with what you like, that's the most important thing.
 
"Know thyself"

if you like huge machinery control field might be the place. Power generation, transportation, manufacturing, all are enjoying increasingly sophisticated control systems.

You'll find feedback theory changes your view of how Mother Nature runs things.
e.g. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/06/14/the-thermostat-hypothesis/
(last comment there is mine)

Communications is IMHO more "hip". But i have no experience in that field so won't comment.
 
track said:
Question is simple. Your opinion all round?

Thanks.
How about a little of both?

484px-SCADA_schematic_overview-s.svg.png

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCADA"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top