Control of coolant temperature in a nuclear reactor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the coolant temperature in a CANDU reactor using DYMOLA software, specifically exploring the relationship between coolant temperature, neutron flux, and power output. Increasing neutron flux raises coolant exit temperature, but the interplay between coolant temperature and reactivity creates a feedback loop that complicates this relationship. The cycle of coolant temperature affecting reactivity, which in turn influences power output and further coolant temperature, raises questions about stability. Additionally, the conversation highlights the differences in coolant temperature control mechanisms between CANDU and PWR reactors, emphasizing the role of enthalpy and heat transfer in the coolant flow. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate reactor modeling and safety assessments.
shrvn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to build a model of CANDU reactor core using a software called DYMOLA.For this purpose,I am trying to figure out a mathematical relation between coolant temperature and Power developed in a reactor.I have the following questions:

1.What is the effect of increasing the neutron flux (hence,increasing the power developed in the core) on the coolant exit temperature.Is there a mathematical relation that relates the temperature of coolant coming out of the reactor to the neutron flux.

2.I read that in a CANDU reactor a decrease in coolant temperature increases the reactivity.

But,consider the following scenario:

Coolant temperature decreases---->>Reactivity increases---->>Power developed in the reactor increases---->>resulting in an increase in coolant temperature---->>which decreases the reactivity!

When does the cycle stop??

Hope you understood my question
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not very familiar with CANDU reactors, however with PWRs the coolant temperature is controlled via steam demand and boric acid concentration. By using more steam, the coolant temperature decreases. Due to the steam generator being a saturated system, simply lowering the pressure of the SG will lower its temperature. This is why uncontrolled heat extractions (steam line breaks) are often a driving scenario for shutdown margin.

There are many on this board who are much more knowledgeable than I when it comes to the mathematics, however I do know for light water PWRs, neutron flux is not constant throughout core life (higher at end of life) due to a lower concentration of U235 as the core ages.
 
The coolant temperature is related to the enthalpy, or specific enthalpy, and pressure.

h = cpT.

The coolant enters the core at some inlet temperature/sp. enthalpy (Ti/hi) and exits with an increase temperature/sp. enthalpy (Te/he).

As the coolant flow along the channel between the fuel rods, heat is transferred from the cladding to the coolant.

h_e = h_i + \Big({\int_o^z q''(z){\pi}D_h dz} + {\int_o^z f_c q'(z) dz}\Big)/GA

where z = axial elevation, or core height for the exit.
q''(z) is the heat flux at the cladding surface,
q' = linear heat rate = πDhq''
Dh = heated diameter (cladding OD)
fc = fraction of heat from fuel that is directly deposited into the coolant rather than conducted through the cladding
G = coolant mass flux (kg/s-m2 in SI)
A = flow area of coolant channel.
 
shrvn said:
But,consider the following scenario:

Coolant temperature decreases---->>Reactivity increases---->>Power developed in the reactor increases---->>resulting in an increase in coolant temperature---->>which decreases the reactivity!

When does the cycle stop??
Don't confuse time dependent with steady-state behavior.

Reactors have several competing reactivity mechanisms. These are in the fuel and moderator, and soluble neutron absorbers, and even integral (in the fuel) burnable absorbers as needed.

Doppler resonance absorption increases with temperature, as does spectral shift when moderator density decreases, which means less moderation. One can also introduce soluble boron into the cooling water or heavy water moderator. In CANDU reactors the coolant and moderator are separate heavy water circuits (Ref: http://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#s).
 
Thank you Astronuc and SmalltownNuke
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top