Control Systems Engineering : Masons Gain

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Mason's Gain formula in control systems engineering, specifically in relation to steady state error and block diagrams. Participants explore the formulation of equations and the construction of block diagrams, addressing issues of dimensional consistency and the relationships between variables in a control system context.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for steady state error resembling Mason's Gain but expresses confusion regarding the application of the formula to their block diagram.
  • Another participant challenges the correctness of the initial equations, pointing out dimensional inconsistencies and suggesting that the relationship between variables needs clarification.
  • A later reply proposes a modified equation for steady state, suggesting that the relationship can be expressed as a*dh/dt = dv/dt = q_in(t) - q_out(t) = 0, and questions whether this leads to correct derivations.
  • Participants discuss the correctness of the block diagram and the resulting loop gain, with one participant stating that their block diagram is now correct and providing a formula for loop gain.
  • Another participant expresses satisfaction with their progress and understanding of signal flow graphs and Mason's formula after further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the initial equations and block diagrams. There are multiple competing views regarding the relationships between variables and the application of Mason's Gain, with some participants correcting earlier claims while others continue to question the validity of the equations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the dimensional consistency of equations and the assumptions made in deriving relationships between variables. The discussion reflects a progression of ideas but does not settle on a definitive solution or agreement.

BartlebyS
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the system I am looking at

image.jpg


Homework Equations



So I worked out a formula for the steady state error and put it in a form similar to masons gain formula

image.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



But when I try and draw a block diagram and work out e I get confused by forward path and loop gain. It's not a question I have been asked, I am just playing, perhaps I cannot apply masons gain to my drawing? Or my drawing is wrong?

image.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equations are not correct. For one thing, they are not dimensionally consistent: dh/dt = qin - qout has different dimensions on each side. q has dimension L^3 whereas dh/dt has dimension LT^(-1). L = length, T = time.

Your block diagram is good up to the point qin but then falls apart. Correct your equation for dh/dt: h cannot = qin - qout, you've already written dh/dt = qin - qout (which was incorrect also).

What is the correct relationship between dh/dt and qin - qout? (Hint: area of the bottom of the tank is a factor). And, once you get dh/dt right, how does one go from dh/dt to h?
 
Thanks for pointing that out, so I came to the idea that

a*dh/dt = dv/dt = q_in(t) - q_out(t) = 0 for steady state

which would make the rest of the derivation ok I hope?

Which then gave me a different drawing for the block diagram.

image.jpg


Which gives me a loop gain of (c_1 - c_2)/as

Instead of the c_1 / c_2 i got when I used the assumption that dv/dt = 0 for steady state. Am I still wrong with my equations or drawing?

I thought I had it for a minute there! Thanks for your help. I don't need to do it, it's just bugging me as I cannot relate it to the rest of my notes.
 
Your block diagram is now correct.

Loop gain = H(s)/H0(s).
 
Thanks again mate, I played with it some more, got the answers I wanted and have a much better understanding of signal flow graphs and masons formula.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K