Convert 60kg to kgf: Help from Physics Forums

  • Thread starter Thread starter hakingpawns
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert the weight of a 60kg man to kgf under a local gravity of 9.6 m/s², the correct approach involves first calculating the weight in Newtons. This is done by multiplying the mass (60kg) by the local gravity (9.6 m/s²), resulting in 576 N. To convert Newtons to kgf, divide by the standard acceleration due to gravity (9.80665 N/kg), yielding approximately 58.8 kgf. The final formula used is 9.6/9.8 x 60 = 58.8 kgf. The discussion concludes with the problem being resolved and the thread marked as solved.
hakingpawns
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello guys from Physics Forums... I got a little problem here..

"Weight of a 60kg man in kgf if the local gravity is 9.6m/s^2"

I got no idea what to do..
I tried 60x 9.6m/s^2
but my teacher said that it was wrong...
I'd really appreciate any help I'll get
and thank you in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weight=Mass*Acceleration due to gravity=m*g
Assuming 60kg weight at 9.8 m/s^2 calculate mass m(60/9.8=6.122)). This will give mass.Now multiply mass by 9.6 to get kgf or weight for that place(6.122*9.6=58.775). Use results in significant figures if needed.
 
Thanks~ now I get it
 
hakingpawns said:
"Weight of a 60kg man in kgf if the local gravity is 9.6m/s^2"

I got no idea what to do..
I tried 60x 9.6m/s^2
That gives you the weight in Newtons. To convert from Newtons to kgf, use: 1 kgf = 9.80665 N
 
So that's how you get the unit KGF..
now I understand more :) thanks a lot! Doc Al & 1994Bhaskar ^_^

so more likely it's
9.6/9.8x60=58.8kgfproblem [SOLVED]
admins/mods you can close the thread now if you want ^_^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top