Convert into polar coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a double integral bounded by an ellipse into polar coordinates. The original poster is struggling with the transformation due to the non-circular nature of the ellipse defined by the equation \(\frac{(x-2)^2}{16} + \frac{(y-4)^2}{36} = 1\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the challenges of converting the ellipse to polar coordinates, with some suggesting a change of variables to simplify the problem. The original poster considers adjusting the polar coordinate equations to account for the ellipse's center.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants offering insights into the necessity and feasibility of converting to polar coordinates. Some express doubt about the effectiveness of this approach, while others suggest that it may not simplify the integrand.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition of the complexity involved in integrating with respect to the given bounds, which some participants find daunting. The original poster expresses a desire for a simpler method, indicating the potential for confusion regarding the integration process.

City88
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve a double integral of a function which is bounded by the ellipse:
\frac{(x-2)^2}{16}} + \frac{(y-4)^2}{36}} = 1
And I can't figure out how to write this in polar coordinate form, and also what my bounds for theta and radius would be.

Homework Equations



I know that for a circle, the polar coordinates are
x=rcos(theta) and y=rsin(theta)
theta going from 0 to 2pi, and r going from o to a(being the radius)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I know that an ellipse is not a circle! so I can't apply this formula without doing some tweaking. Can anyone help with this "tweaking"?

I have started by thinking it would be something like..
x=rcos(theta) + 2
y=rsin(theta) + 4
Because the ellipse is not in the center, but I can't figure out what else to do...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably the easiest thing to do is to make a change of variables, say u = x-2, v = y-4.
 
squashed circle

Hi City88! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π :smile:)

I don't understand why you want to convert to polar coordinates. :confused:

Does this help? … An ellipse is a squashed circle, so you can represent it as x = a cosθ, y = b sinθ. :smile:
 
Even after doing that, I'm still stuck..

x-2 = u = rcos(theta)
y-4 = v = rsin(theta)

Wouldn't I still have to add (more like multiply) something to the rcos(t)? The radius still isn't circular because the u2 and v2's are divided by 42 and 62.
 
[Deleted]
 
City88 said:
Tiny-tim, my original question is …
City88 said:
M_{x}= \int \int\ y dx dy
<br /> M_{y}= \int \int\ x dx dy

Where the region is bounded by the ellipse:
\frac{(x-2)^2}{16}} + \frac{(y-4)^2}{36}} = 1

Hi City88! :smile:

You'd only convert to polar coordinates if your integrand was simpler in polar coordinates.

In this case, your integrand is either x or y which are obviously simpler in … x and y coordinates! :rolleyes:

Just integrate along strips of thickness dx or dy. :smile:
 
Yes, earlier I wrote
"This problem may be easier in polar coordinates."... but I was using 'may' in the sense that I had not really thought about it.
 
Thats what I first thought also...but then I realized the equation was just waaaay too messy for my liking. So then I figured polar coordinates may have to be used, since an ellipse sort of resembled a circle.

I just tried doing it again, but by keeping it in terms of x and y...and well it's messy!

for example, if I integrate with respect to x first, my bounds for that integral would be something like..

x goes from \pm 4\sqrt{1-\frac{(y-4)^{2}}{6^{2}}}+2

so is it just me, or does integrating over those bounds seem frightening? I feel as though there should be an easier way to do this. But I guess I'll just integrate this mess and try to make it work!
 
  • #10
messy bounds

City88 said:
… for example, if I integrate with respect to x first, my bounds for that integral would be something like..

x goes from \pm 4\sqrt{1-\frac{(y-4)^{2}}{6^{2}}}+2

so is it just me, or does integrating over those bounds seem frightening? I feel as though there should be an easier way to do this. But I guess I'll just integrate this mess and try to make it work!

Hi City88! :smile:

Messy bounds in the first integral don't matter, so long as the integrand is easy.

Of course, messy bounds in the first integral might make a messy integrand in the second integral …

so did it … ? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K