I Converting a Single ODE to Matrix Form for Eigenvalue Analysis

SeM
Hi, I have the following ODE:

aY'' + bY' + c = 0

I would like to convert it to a matrix, so to evaluate its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. I have done so for phase.plane system before, however there were two ODEs there. In this case, there is only one, so how does this look like in a matrix form given that this is non homogenous? Is it as such:

\binom{a \ \ 1}{-b \ \ 1}\binom{c}{0}}

Or how is it correct to convert ONE ODE to matrix form, and from there study it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
you can write a second order ode as a system of two first order ode's by introducing new variables:
## y_1 = Y ##
## y_2 = \frac{dY}{dx} ##

such that the original ode becomes:
## a\frac{dy_2}{dx} + by_1 +c = 0##
with the auxiliary ode:
## y_2 = \frac{dy_1}{dx} ##
 
  • Like
Likes SeM and mfb
Thanks!
 
Is there any chance of getting the constant c in the matrix form at all, or should a matrix form rather give the homogenous form in order to solve the eigenvalues?
 
Well, do you think the eigenvalues will change by the constant c?
 
No, they won't indeed! Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top