Converting line slopes to angles

  • Thread starter Thread starter danne89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between line slopes and angles, specifically using trigonometric functions to express this connection. The equation presented is sin(v) = m / √(1 + m²), which relates the slope (m) to the angle (v). Acknowledgment is given to the simpler relationship tan(α) = m, highlighting its significance in understanding the conversion. Participants are encouraged to share any simpler equations they may know. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing these mathematical relationships.
danne89
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'm examining the equality between line slopes and angles. I've, using trig, conclude that this equation holds:
sin(v) = \frac{m}{ \sqrt{1+m^2}}
Anyone knowing a simpler equation is very welcome to post.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
\tan{\alpha} = m.
 
Ahhh! Why wasn't I thinking about THAT? I congratulate you for your clevernes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top