Converting square root to perfect square

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the method of converting the expression √(36 + x²) into a perfect square by substituting x with 3(t - 1/t). This substitution leads to the expression 9(t + 1/t)², simplifying the original square root. The user questions the rationale behind choosing this specific substitution and whether there is a rule governing such transformations. Ultimately, the discussion reveals that while the method is effective, there is no formal rule for selecting this particular substitution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic manipulation and substitutions
  • Familiarity with square roots and perfect squares
  • Knowledge of functions and their representations
  • Basic calculus concepts, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research algebraic substitutions in calculus, focusing on trigonometric and hyperbolic functions
  • Explore methods for simplifying square root expressions in algebra
  • Study the properties of perfect squares and their applications in solving equations
  • Learn about different techniques for integrating complex functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra and calculus, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone interested in advanced problem-solving techniques involving square roots and substitutions.

cstvlr
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

I have a problem in my book in which they use a method of making sqrt( 36 + x^2 ) a perfect square by simply making x = 3( t - 1/t ) and then we get 9( t + 1/t )^2 by substituting back into sqrt(36 + x^2). My question is that why did the chose 3( t - 1/t ), is there a rule?

thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What were they trying to do with the expression √(36+x2) ? For example, if they were trying to integrate, you could have made a simple trig substitution instead of trying to think of some odd set of functions to string together.
 
no its in an equation form,

C(x) = [(9-x) + 1.25sqrt( x^2 + 36 )], where C(x) is a function.

and they're trying to solve for x, so they used the method above, and I know how to solve it, but I lost it when they used let x = 3( t - 1/t )
 
cstvlr said:
no its in an equation form,

C(x) = [(9-x) + 1.25sqrt( x^2 + 36 )], where C(x) is a function.

and they're trying to solve for x, so they used the method above, and I know how to solve it, but I lost it when they used let x = 3( t - 1/t )

x = 3( t - 1/t ) ⇒ x2 = 9( t - 1/t )2

∴√(36+x2)=√(36+9(t- 1/t)2), how does that turn into an expression like √(a+b)2?

I do not think there rule per se for using that substitution though.
 
Fair enough, thanks anyway.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K