Converting volume elements to area elements

VantagePoint72
Messages
820
Reaction score
34

Homework Statement



I need to evaluate an integral of the form:

h(\vec{x}) = \int d^3\vec{x}' \frac{\delta(r' - R)}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|}

where r' = |\vec{x}'| = \sqrt{x'^2 + y'^2 + z'^2}.

Homework Equations



The above, and maybe the fact that \delta(g(x)) = \sum_i \frac{\delta(x - x_i)}{|g'(x_i)|} where x_i are the roots of g.

The Attempt at a Solution



I can solve the problem with some physical motivation as follows:

The given integral is the same as what you would do if you wanted to calculate the electrostatic potential of a charged spherical shell: V(\vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int d\tau' \frac{\rho(\vec{x}')}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|} where d\tau is the volume element and \rho(\vec{x}') = \delta(r' - R). In this case, the delta function restricts the "charge density" rho to the surface of the shell. The same physical problem can be treated with the formula for the electrostatic potential of a surface charge distribution: V(\vec{x}) = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\int da' \frac{\sigma(\vec{x}')}{|\vec{x}-\vec{x}'|} where da is the area element and, in this case, we can take \sigma = 1. This integral can now be computed straightforwardly in spherical coordinates, e.g. Griffiths "Introduction to Electrodynamics" example 2.7, yielding h(\vec{x}) = 4\pi R^2 / |\vec{x}|.

However, I would like to be able to do this calculation without having to use physical intuition to interpret a volume integral with a delta function as being equivalent to a surface integral without the delta function; that is, I just want to explicitly integrate out one of x,y, or z with the delta function and then go from there. How do I do this? I've tried using the equation I gave in (2), but it just produces a giant mess from which I don't know how to proceed.

I guess an equivalent question would be: given the expression above for the electrostatic potential of a volume distribution (which is really a surface dist.) of charge with \rho(\vec{x}) = \sigma \cdot \delta(f(\vec{x})), how do you rigorously derive the expression for a surface distribution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like you need the "divergence theorem":
\int\int_V\int \nabla\cdot \vec{f} dV= \int_S\int \vec{f}\cdot d\vec{S}
where S is the surface bounding volume V.
 
Can you expand on that? I know what the divergence theorem is, but there are no divergences in this problem. My question isn't: "given an integral over a region, how do you convert it to an integral on the boundary"? It's: "given an integral over all space but over a delta function, how do you convert it to an integral without the delta function over the surface that the delta function restricts to?"
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top