Convex mirror find object distance

AI Thread Summary
An object is placed in front of a convex mirror with a radius of curvature of 45.6 cm, forming a virtual image that is half the size of the object. The initial calculations using the mirror formula and magnification led to confusion regarding the signs of the distances and heights. After correcting the approach, the object distance was recalculated to be 68.4 cm. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying the signs for virtual images and ensuring proper use of brackets in equations. Ultimately, the revised answer is accepted as correct.
xamy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object is placed in front of a convex mirror with a 45.6-cm radius of curvature. A virtual image half the size of the object is formed. At what distance is the object from the mirror?

Homework Equations


1/f=1/d0+1/di
hi/h0=-di/d0

The Attempt at a Solution


hi=-1/2h0
f=45.6/2=22.8

di=-1/2d0

1/22.8=1/d0-2/d0
d0=-22.8

This is my solution but this is nor correct...anyone please tell me the mistake. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xamy said:
di=-1/2d0
Firstly please use brackets, it looks like it may be ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2d_o}##or ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2}d_o##
and i don't see the need for the -ve sign in the above equation(logically).
Also because when you substitute the ##h_i## you should negate it as it is inverted, so there shouldn't be a -ve sign for your above equation
 
Suraj M said:
Firstly please use brackets, it looks like it may be ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2d_o}##or ##d_i=\frac{-1}{2}d_o##
and i don't see the need for the -ve sign in the above equation(logically).
Also because when you substitute the ##h_i## you should negate it as it is inverted, so there shouldn't be a -ve sign for your above equation

ok so after editing the ans becomes
1/22.8=1/d0+2/d0
d0=68.4
 
I'm sorry i correct myself, i thought it was a concave mirror, so you shouldn't negate ##h_i## as it is erect.
you were right. The answer you have obtained, looks to be right. Why do you feel it is wrong?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top