Conveying inner product with words

qubyte
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the proper way to say, \langleA|B\rangle .

I have recently heard, "The inner product of A with B." But I'm not sure if this is correct. Does anyone know the proper order in which to place A and B in the sentence?

As a simple example: Suppose you're speaking with someone on the phone. Then one way to convey the expression, \frac{x^{2} + 2d}{5} , is "x squared plus two d all over five."
How would you do the same with \langleA|B\rangle ?

If someone could also point me in the direction of some literature where this is exemplified, that would very kind.
I must have missed this some where along the line, and I can't seem to find a solid answer anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The inner product of A and B with A in the first slot. This order qualifier is necessary in the case of a complex vector space. For reals the order doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TheOldHag said:
The inner product of A and B with A in the first slot. This order qualifier is necessary in the case of a complex vector space. For reals the order doesn't matter.

I appreciate the response. Anywhere I may be able to find an explicit example of this?
 
Since western languages are read and written from left to right, I don't think "the inner product of A and B" is any more ambiguous than "A minus B," which nobody would interpret as meaning ##B-A##.

Of course if you are in an environment where left-to-right writing is not a universal rule, you might need to be more careful.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top