Convicting a Defendant: Finding the Optimal Threshold for Conviction Probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Convicting a Defendant

Homework Statement
Evidence concerning the guilt of a defendant in a criminal investigation can be summarized by the value of an exponential random variable X whose mean m depends on whether the defendant is guilty: If innocent, m = 1; if guilty, m = 2. The deciding judge will rule the defendant guilty if X > c for some c.

(a) If the judge wants to be 95 % certain that an innocent man will not be convicted, what should the value of c be?

(b) Using the value of c in (a), what is the probability that a guilty defendant is convicted?

The attempt at a solution
Concerning (a), is 95 % the probability that an innocent man will not be convicted? In other words, I have to find c such that P{X <= c} = 0.95 right and use m = 1 right?

Concerning (b), all I need to do is find P{X > c} with the c value of (a) and m = 2 right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes to both of your questions.
 
Thanks. I always have trouble interpreting probability questions.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Back
Top