Coriolis effect and water experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Uganda water experiment, which claims to demonstrate the Coriolis effect on water drainage, is widely regarded as a tourist attraction rather than a legitimate scientific experiment. The Coriolis effect is strongest at the poles and negligible at the equator, making any observable effect in such experiments minimal. Discussions reveal that the experiment lacks scientific rigor and is often viewed as a trick to attract visitors. The debate surrounding its validity remains unresolved, with conflicting opinions on its scientific merit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Coriolis effect and its implications in fluid dynamics.
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts, particularly angular momentum and rotation.
  • Knowledge of geographical influences on physical phenomena, especially near the equator.
  • Awareness of scientific experimentation standards and methodologies.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Coriolis effect in fluid dynamics and its mathematical representation.
  • Explore the principles behind Foucault's pendulum and its relation to Earth's rotation.
  • Investigate the scientific validity of popular experiments claiming to demonstrate the Coriolis effect.
  • Learn about the geographical and physical factors influencing water drainage patterns.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in scientific disciplines, and anyone interested in the intersection of geography and physical science, particularly regarding the Coriolis effect and its misconceptions.

Rzbs
Messages
52
Reaction score
11
Is the Uganda water experiment (that shows corilios effect on water drain) a scientific experiment or not?
I searched but I couldn't find a final answer to this question. There are two opposite opinions, which one is correct?
Or this argument is an open issue yet?
Thanks for your replies...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rzbs said:
Summary:: Is the Uganda water experiment a scientific experiment or not?

Is the Uganda water experiment (that shows corilios effect on water drain) a scientific experiment or not?
I searched but I couldn't find a final answer to this question. There are two opposite opinions, which one is correct?
Or this argument is an open issue yet?
Thanks for your replies...
https://thepointsguy.com/2017/07/travel-myths-backwards-water/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost and Rzbs
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rzbs
Thanks, so the Uganda water experiment is only a trick and a show for absorbing tourists, yes?
 
Rzbs said:
Thanks, so the Uganda water experiment is only a trick and a show for absorbing tourists, yes?
I guess so!
 
On th back of an envelope: the Coriolis effect is maximum at the poles, zero at the equator. So take the sine of the longitude (=sin(44,9... degrees) of the amazed tourists, and multiply this with the ratio of the angular velocity w of the water (w=O(1)) turning w.r.t. the Earth's rotation (w=2pi/86400).

I'd guess that's one heck of a small number.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and Rzbs
During the world year of physics in 2005 I was assisting at a Foucault's pendulum hanging at our city's church, where Shell held a conference one day. An engineer told me he witnessed the Coriolis effect at the equator. I tried to convinced him he was scammed. He was reluctant.

That was the moment I started to doubt whether it would be a good idea to let Shell search for and suck up oil near the North Pole.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur, FactChecker and etotheipi
haushofer said:
Shell
They paid dowsers to locate buried drainage tiles (so they would not be damaged by exploration activities).
 
There are Coriolis effects any time the angular rotation vector and the relative velocity vector relative to the rotating reference frame has a non-zero cross product. That can happen anywhere on earth. The position is not in the equation. It just may not be very apparent at the equator in certain experiments. It depends on the direction of the relative velocity vector.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
753
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K