Coriolis force effect on skydivers?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Coriolis force and its effect on falling objects, specifically in the context of skydivers and other objects dropped from significant heights. Participants explore the historical observations attributed to Galileo and seek to understand the calculations involved in determining the horizontal displacement caused by the Coriolis effect during free fall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Galileo's observations regarding falling objects may be exaggerated or mythologized, particularly concerning the Coriolis effect.
  • One participant calculates the expected horizontal shift due to the Coriolis effect for various heights, noting that the shift is minimal (less than a millimeter for 10 meters) and becomes more significant (6 meters for a 4000-meter drop) under specific conditions.
  • Another participant requests equations that describe the horizontal movement of falling objects influenced by the Coriolis force, indicating a desire for concrete examples of the phenomenon.
  • A detailed mathematical formulation of the Coriolis effect is presented, including equations that incorporate the Earth's rotation and the resulting displacements in different dimensions, with a specific example showing a displacement of about 2.2 cm over a 100-meter fall.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the historical accuracy of Galileo's observations and the significance of the Coriolis effect in practical scenarios. There is no consensus on the implications of these observations or the calculations presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes varying assumptions about the conditions under which the Coriolis effect is measured, such as wind conditions and the height of the drop. The mathematical formulations rely on approximations that may not account for all variables in real-world scenarios.

dwightlathan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Galileo observed that objects dropped from height hit ground to the east of a plumb bob. I guess this is due to the Coriolis force. How would this distance be calculated for something like a baseball off the Empire State Building or a skydiver?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwightlathan said:
Galileo observed that objects dropped from height hit ground to the east of a plumb bob. I guess this is due to the Coriolis force. How would this distance be calculated for something like a baseball off the Empire State Building or a skydiver?
I doubt that Galileo measured this. If you compute the shift, it is of less than a millimeter for a height of 10 meters. Of course, it is well known that Galileo played on the leaning tower of Pisa and its 55 meters. For this height the shift is of 8 mm and could be measurable if you could stop the wind. I think that it is part of the Galileo myth. For a spherical form sky diver in no wind conditions the shift would be of 6 meters for a drop of 4000 meters. Of course this is for a jump from a stationary helicopter.

Please, leave Coriolis alone!
 
Curiosity is a powerful thing :)

You may be right about Galileo's observations being myth, Lpfr. Whether he did or didn't Galileo certainly isn't credited for discovering the Coriolis effect.

Can anyone post the equations used to determine the horizontal movement? To many people it would be a concrete example of an abstract phenomenon.
 
Fcor = 2mr' x Omega = 2mv x Omega

Omega depends upon the location of the object since the Earth isn't a perfect sphere. But it's generally seen as about 7.3 x 10^-5 s^-1.

When Coriolis is added to free fall, the equation becomes r''= g + 2r' x Omega.

r'= (x',y',x') and Omega (0,Omega sin(theta), Omega cos(theta))

The equation of motion for the x-dimension becomes 2Omega(y'cos(theta) - z'sin(theta)). Y-dimension= -2Omega x' cos(theta) and z-dimension= -g + 2Omega x' sin (theta).

Working through approximations, working those approximations back into the original equations and so forth, you get a rough approximation that x= 1/3 Omega(gt^3)sin(theta).

Let's say you put theta at 90 degrees and let an object fall for about 20 seconds with g at 10 m/s/s. The x displacement is only about 2.2 cm, while it fell 100 meters.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K