Coriolis Force, Motion of projectile

AI Thread Summary
Coriolis force impacts projectile motion on Earth and varies with latitude, which raises questions about its consideration in differential equations. Some argue that latitude changes during projectile motion should be accounted for, while others suggest that the total Coriolis force remains independent of latitude. The discussion highlights a potential misconception regarding the integration of latitude effects in projectile motion equations. An article on the historical context of the Coriolis effect is also referenced for further reading. Understanding the nuances of Coriolis force is essential for accurate projectile motion analysis.
jiho.j
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I've been wonder something about coriolis force.

Well... when we consider motion of projectile on earth, we have to consider coriolis force due to Earth's rotation and we know that coriolis force varies with latitude.

In the book (fowles's) they set differential equation and just integrate them without considering latitude change. well... I mean I think latitude varies when particle is moving. But why they are not consider it? can we just ignore it? or is it my misconception?

sorry for my english. English is not my mother tounge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jiho.j said:
we know that coriolis force varies with latitude.
The component parallel to the surface, related to movement parallel to the surface varies with latitude.

The total coriolis force related to the total movement doesn't depend on the latitude.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Coriolis acceleration of a projectile launched at the equator
Replies
4
Views
2K
Coriolis force in rotating space station
Replies
3
Views
3K
A Puzzle Involving the Moon's Orbital Motion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Coriolis Force and the Earth's Rotation,
Replies
14
Views
3K
Torque about center of mass due to Coriolis force, is it 0?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Coriolis force and conservation of angular momentum
Replies
8
Views
4K
I If we throw a ball with initial velocity v0, is there a force?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Does rotational motion affect the translational motion?
Replies
3
Views
2K
The Coriolis Force: Where Will It Take You?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Is the movement of winds due to coriolis or centripetal force?
Replies
44
Views
15K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top